Town Board agenda packet — March 17, 2026 (full text)

FRIENDS OF GRIFFINS MILLS, NY February 27, 2026 To: Aurora ‘Town Board Aurora Municipal Center 575 Oadkwoed Ave, East Aurora, NY 14052 As you may recall, last year, the Town, Board supported our effort install a Hanilet of Griffins Mills Wel to acquire and comes You, sign at the west end of Road across from the intersection the hamlet en Mill of Lather Road. In follow-up te our add. Weleome signage to both ends of Mill last year’s request to Support to acquire and install the 294 Road, the Friends of Griffins Mills sign at the East entry to the Hamlet. requests your on Mill Road. Once again, we have engaged Visu Same Cost as. the first sign, which is $1,8al Impact to produce the 24 matching sign at the. 10 * We are-asking for the Town Board’s Supp willing to consider earmarking $1,0 ort for this signage, and if you would be 00 from the 2026 Wést Falis Beautifi will make wp the balance of the cost cation Fund. We with a chee k of $810 made out to the Town of Aurora, Thank you for your consideration in this matter, Respectfully submitted, Alan Davis, President 1266 Lather Road East Aurora, NY 14052 Ddavisso4@ roadrunner.com,

West end of Gri iffing. M ills

TOWN OF AURORA 575 OAKWOOD AVENUE, EAST AURORA, NY 14052 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (716) 652-7591 FAX (716) 652-3507 MEMO TO: Chuck Snyder, and Town Board Members FROM: Doug Crow, Chairman, Planning Board DATE: March 11th, 2026 The following actions were taken on March 4", 2026, at the meeting of the Planning Board Chairman Doug Crow acknowledged that there will be 5 voting members. Norm Merriman made a motion to the Planning Board to recommend to the Town Board to approve the Site Plan request for 1196 Big Tree Road, SBL# 165,00-1-28.21, as presented by Sorgi & McCarthy, PLLC, for the redevelopment of the present site for a campground with a wellness theme and customarily incidental accessory-use structures. Second, by Ben Garvey, with the condition that the Building Department provide clarification that the main building is considered under the Agricultural zoning district for zoning ordinances and the rights there of, and not in the Rural Residential zoning district. Upon a vote being taken: Ayes- 3 Noes- 2 Motion denied Norm Merriman made a motion to the Planning Board to recommend to the Town Board to approve the Special Use permit request for 1196 Big Tree Road, SBL# 165.00-1-28.21, as presented by Sorgi & McCarthy, PLLC, for the redevelopment of the present site for a campground with a wellness theme and customarily incidental accessory-use structures. Second, by Ben Garvey, with the condition that the Building Department provide clarification that the main building is considered under the Agricultural zoning district for zoning ordinances and the rights there of, and not in the Rural Residential zoning district. Upon a vote being taken: Ayes- 3 Noes- 2 Motion denied It is the recommendation of the Building Department that the Town Board refer the application back io the Planning Board at their next scheduled meeting to review and provide findings for the denial of both applications as outlined under TOA 95-3F. Town council was engaged and. provided guidance that NYS Town Law §271(16), as referenced under TOA 23-5, does require the majority of voting members on the entire board (7 members) to be in the affirmative (4 members) to render an approval. Attached to this memo is the draft meeting minutes.

MINUTES OF A MEETING AS HELD BY THE TOWN OF AURORA PLANNING & CONSERVATION BOARD March 4", 2026 Members Present: Chairman Doug Crow Norm Merriman Chris Contento Tim Stroth Alternate Member: Ben Garvey Absent/ Excused: Chris Contento Laurie Katina Angela Griffis Chelsea Root William Heidt Also Present: Peter Sorgi, Hopkins, Sorgi & McCarthy, PLLC Danielle Johnson, Crafted Concepts Daniel LaPietra, Carmina Wood Design Rich Miga, Assistant Code Enforcement Officer Chairman Doug Crow presided over the meeting, which began at 7:00 p.m. at the Town Hall, 575 Oakwood Avenue, East Aurora, NY. He led the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS: Chairman Doug Crow asked the board if anyone would like to make a motion on the minutes from last month. Tim Stroth made a motion to approve the February 4 2026, meeting minutes. Second by Ben Garvey Upon a vote being taken: Ayes- 5 Noes- 0 Motion carried Chairman Doug Crow stated that there are five (5) voting members present, and all were voting members, With a possible sixth member, but the member is running late, and as long as four members vote in favor, it will pass,

Chairman Doug Crow stated that the following application on the agenda is large and would like to split it out to ensure that people who want to speak can be heard. He noted the Planning Board is a recommendation board, and the Town Board will make the final decision after a public hearing. NEW BUSINESS: The Town Board made a referral to the Planning Board for the review and recommendation of a Site Plan and Special Use permit applications for 1196 Big Tree Road Uh.Lit 165.00-1-28.21, as submitted by Carner Development Group Incorporated. The application is for tt ‘redevelopment of the present site for a campground with a wellness theme and customarily i a I ‘ accessory-use structures. Chairman Doug Crow asked for an introduction of the ap cr and a bri ts description of the project. Peter Sorgi, protect attorney, from Hopkins, Sorgi & dl. aatthy, PLLC. iB i : . Daniel LaPietra, project civil engineer, from Carmina vig sf &4 Xi Danielle Johnson, project architect, from cM ‘gape: pts. hy Peter Sorgi stated that they are here for the ~~ i a @ ee their . dan and Special Use permit applications. This is under the d — n of your Ea mi f y ind. Carner Development has two other campgrounds in ia i Aemisisone on" on Heritage Lake. They also have other hospitality-oriented déy¢ pments tf it fF Nicoll is (Sand then of course The Bank and The Liberty buildings in East Auron i he ee sil Peter Sorgi then a Ae alg om As a the property with ariel renderings. He spoke of the conservati H a hi alking paths that are existing. ul ye no it , ae hy mh é : >». gre with the people associated to the conversation Chairman Doug ny ~ if there easement? Ip Peter Sorgi replied, yes,Nye ; group & e Genesee Valley Landi Conservancy. He also noted that Rachael is not here tonight for a perso ¢ Peter Sorgi went on to say that ‘\ ne main house is going to be renovated. They are working with New York State Historic Preservation on that because it is historic property. There will be no additions, but they will be improved in terms of general maintenance, windows, and roofing: The main building will be converted into seven sleeping quarters as well as being the administrative space for the property. Thee is an existing house behind this building that is called the farmhouse, that is proposed to be converted into two additional sleeping quarters. Peter Sorgi then recited the definition of campground from the Town’s Zoning code and stated that they are proposing seven seasonal cottages and two tree houses. These seasonal structures are similar to the ones they have in the Town of Torre and Seneca Lake. These projects can be found on Carner website. He went on to

describe one existing building that will be used as a wellness center, as they consider this project as more of an upscale campground, and another building that will be new construction that will be a lodge. Chairman Doug Crow stated he saw the lodge was 2,400 square feet, but how big is the existing building that will be the wellness center? Danielle Johnson replied that she does not know off hand. Peter Sorgi stated that the main house would be greater as it has multiple floors. Peter Sorgi went on to describe the submitted documents to include the SWPPPS and all the engineering and architectural plans needed for this submission and review. He noted that they will have to look at and may need to widen the access lanes for fire safety access. This would be fleshed out during the SEQR process and with the fire company comments with the Town Board. Chairman Doug Crow agreed and noted hard packed lanes. Daniel LaPietra also noted that the fire access width would need to be 20 feet-and there will be a need for turnarounds in a few spots. Peter Sorgi continued to state that they are looking to only impact an acre of land, and the big picture is to help preserve the historical property. Lilke the Knox estate, it’s not ideal for a single-family home as it would cost too much to maintain, repair, and manage the slate roof. This property is very unique and the Town is luckily that the zoning code allows for this type of use. Chairman Doug Crow noted he found the square footage of 3,400 square feet for the wellness center in the parking calculations. Chairman Doug Crow asked whether the parking calculations are required for each use even though the accessory uses are used by the occupants for the sleeping units, is that correct? Peter Sorgi replied that you must look at the situation and determine what the parking is going to be. He went on to describe a scenario in the Village. Asst. CEO Richard Miga interjected that parking will be calculated based on the intent use of the structure and. then what the zoning code table establishes for that use. This can be by square footage or by spaces per guestroom. Peter Sorgi stated that he thought the Town code may allow the Town Board to waive those types of requirements. Chairman Doug Crow replied that would bea variance requirement. Asst. CEO Richard Miga concurred with that statement.

Peter Sorgi stated they will comply without variance. Chairman Doug Crow inquired about the SHPO. Peter Sorgi stated that SHPO signed off on the archaeological, and that they are working with them on the basic maintenance improvements. Chairman Doug Crow requested clarification that this property is eli pe historic but is not historical yet. Peter Sorgi confirmed it is eligible and they hired Clinton x 4@ li i facilitate this. l t(s) wa te .. Chairman Doug Crow asked Asst. CEO as to whether€- Asst. CEO Richard Miga stated that would depend ox cific cavinenet ie i structure and whether fire protection system is required. These units would b sidered igor unit % is a hotel and motel, and those aspects may incur having a sprinkler system, «: b wo ave to go thre » code analysis. “t Peter Sorgi noted that DEC issued permitsf@‘ {ty ounds ai. = Chairman Doug Crow asked the board if they hed) a, %, ry Chris Contento asked a i <my phy tent for" Xs Peter Sorgi said no. I i li, i 7 Tim Stro y ay Cei ee‘l a w hy ( Nba , 4 iP ot. th s Peter Sorgi re (: that theSe hous », i i l] be yearoy and the cottages and trechouses as seasonal. He then recited the ta » Tim Stroth questioned" 4 , ‘ by : the malij/house was in the Rural Residential (RR) or the Agriculture (Ag) zoning district. Peter Sorgi noted that the >». hud Gyline goes right through the building and the building is mostly in the Ag district. He stated he has a a ussion regarding this with Ms. Cassidy of the Building Department. Tim Stroth asked if that is an official interpretation from the building department regarding the main building being considered in the Ag district? Asst. CEO Richard Miga confirmed that Liz’s interpretation is the interpretation of our office. Peter Sorgi noted that the board having the application in front of you is the Building Department’s approval of the application.

Tim Stroth inquired about the reference to a hotel earlier in the meeting. Peter Sorgi stated that this came from the Assist CEO and regarding the parking calculations as campground does not have defined criteria in the parking table. Tim Stroth asked for a description of the lodge. Peter Sorgi replied that the lodge was going to be used for activities at the campground. They are also looking to keep the existing pool and.repurpose the existing tennis courts into a recreational surface. Tim Stroth asked if the lodge would have tables and chairs or for standing rooms, or both and what will be the occupancy? Multiple people talking. Peter Sorgi stated that the space will be used for a variety of things, but it is not defined. Danielle Johnson noted that the owner shoes the style of the lodge based on the previous greenhouse that was on the property. She stated that the greenhouse is gone but the pad remains. Tim Stroth inquired about a traffic study by Passaro Associate that was done under the previous application and whether they concluded that there wouldn’t be any impact? Peter Sorgi said that is correct and it was based on it on a New York State highway and the size of 20A. Tim Stroth asked if the board could get a copy of that report. Peter Sorgi said they can provide, but it was apart of the use variance application. They will need to adjust it based on the uses of the current plan. Chairman Doug Crow open the floor to public comments. The chairman noted that this is not a public hearing and a public hearing will be schedule by the Town Board, Taylor Quinn of 1224 Big Tree Road voiced her family’s opposition to this project that is described as a campground with a wellness theme and customary incidental accessory-uses because it seems to be a repackaging with different terminology of what was previously proposed in the commercial rezoning application that was denied. Ms. Quinn brought up numerous questions regarding parking, a campground verses a resort, wedding events, and public notification of this meeting, Megan Quinn of 1224 Big Tree Road spoke regarding the short environmental assessment form (SEAF) noting the proposed action was permitted under zoning and consistent with the existing building and landscape, but this proposal suggests otherwise, She requested that the traffic study be made available and verified with NYSDOT, as the SEAF indicated no impact. She raised concern over stormwater and the change in the rural

character of the area. She and her family are opposed to the application and asked the board to look at the long- term effects of this application. Rod Simeon of 85 Byeberry Court raised concerns regarding the zoning of the lot and the districts of RR and Ag, as it pertains to the definition of a campground. He asked whether campground and camp are one of the same. Chairman Doug Crow replied that the board’s understanding is that ia a campground is based on the agriculture zoning district on the lot and the wellness site is apart | Mocessory- -use of the camp/campground, and that camp/eampground ini the agriculture zoning district ‘é i ou i Asst. CEO Richard Miga interjected in agreement with a A st H iy ‘ Uh Rod Simeon states that under Rural Residential sf i'6-8.4A(6), the well ih enter is not permitted use Mg based on the application exceeding the allowable limit tgs i 4 Chairman Doug Crow replied that the boarg 3 derstandin, application is cero’ under the agriculture (116-8.5) for the proposed applie ih .. nd "os include # 1 in building where the building is in both the RR and Ag districts. Peter i Sorgi responded : that ‘ theiaN mor tion: is iy poln: is solely in the As district and aee e aspects of permitte “i ~~ e€ q Rod Simeon then suasione he ‘ ied, if it is not seasonal and exceeding the pare) Q =! oO Q permitted allotment of employee uy iy Peter Sorgi reap 6 iGi Page yVtompliane with the code because the application is presented. au iC ‘boatd for re | is considered in the Ag district and customary incidental not. ‘e Rod Simeon then say t the board Wiking theif deliberation that they should seek Town’s council before voting. % ] Courtney, of 1289 Main af baud ‘Road) stated that she seconds the points that were made in the public comments and is concerned that te I tivation isi a play on words, and that a year-round camping facility that is within a house is not considered atel Dan Quinn of 1224 Big Tree Road stated concems of the intent of this large financial investment being achievable as a campground if other things not clearly defined in the application are sought to get a return on the investment. He then stated an example of the closest campground, Three-Valley Campground iin Holland, that is 460 acres as a comparison. Chairman Doug Crow asks in closing the public comment asked if Peter Sorgi has any closing comments.

Peter Sorgi responded, by reiterating that the application was compliance with the code and not a play on words. He also clarified the public comment that indicated the previous application was for a use variance that was denied and not a rezoning application. He also stated that they did their due diligence with the application, SWPPP, stormwater, and septic. In closing he stated that if the application did not meet the code, it should be denied, otherwise a recommended approval should be rendered, and the Town attorney does not have legal authority to interpret the code, that is the position of the Code Enforcement Officer, and the application is before you so we are past that. Tim Stroth made a point of clarification that there was a rezoning application request from last June 4th that the board reviewed. Peter Sorgi agreed, and that it was withdrawn and not denied. Tim Stroth questioned whether item 18 on the site plan checklist was completed as members of the audience were not notified. Asst. CEO Richard Miga responded that public hearing notification with be through the Town Clerks office once scheduled and our office will work with the Town Clerk with that. Tim Stroth reiterated the aspect of the application regarding the zoning districts and then questioned the year- round and seasonal uses of the customary accessory uses and structures as being a camp use. Peter Sorgi responded that some are year-round and some will be seasonal, and the code allows for year-round campground. He stated that there will be nine sleeping units that will be year-round and nine that will be seasonal. He noted that they all could be year-round if they decide to winterize the seasonal units. He stated as well that the conservation easement does allow certain things like cross country skiing and walking paths, which is encourage, so people can enjoy the beautiful area. Tim Stroth asked for clarification that there will be no impact to the conservation easement. Peter Sorgi responded that they will not violate the law and will not impact on the conservation easement as there would be fines involved. Norm Merriman asked if the wellness center will only be for the campers or will it at some point be open to people outside of the campground? Peter Sorgi responded that he believes it will be for the campers, but he does not really know the answer to that. It is not intended to be a standalone entity. Chairman Doug Crow states that they should move to discussion among the board. Tim Stroth asked Asst. CEO if there are any existing variances on the property?

Asst. CEO Richard Miga responded that there is a variance #1293 for professional practice in an accessory building on the premises. Chairman Doug Crow asked whether the variance expired with the change in ownership? Asst, CEO Richard Miga responded that the variance stays with the property unless the owner relinquishes it to the Town’s Zoning Board of Appeals. Tim Stroth asked if we received any feedback. from the Town ak.ere Asst. CEO Richard Miga responded that at this time we haye . ig,have not received feedback from Erie County about the SEQR application that was submitted ae ebruar: Ny 2026. Tim Stroth stated that the board received an email rege if 4 ‘ this application, hy d the board interpret whether the points raised are valid? i) ‘ Dp, Asst. CEO Richard Miga stated that email * ~ \y Ape 4 from the >. oe up and speaking to you tonight. 20> a hi y rien ih Chairman Doug Crow asked the board if they Board members confirmed thg| d i . q Chris Contento asked Asst. “ hether or a season one wy | my Asst, CEO Rig) ssree SE iyhay unit definition. iN definition me hotel "hy the Zoning code. Ul tin, Ben Garvey « qi » Asst, CEO RichardByethat slé ping ont De not defined and we would look at the state code for that. Ben Garvey recited the defi Ne ipground from the Zoning code. He then states that there is ambiguity between whether it is a seep tay ‘ a hotel dwelling unit, but if the main draw is to be able to provide access to property as a campground, he “0 ot go to a hotel to hike, Peter Sorgi noted that the rule of law in the state and he quotes “zoning ordinance because they're in derogation in favor of the common law and must be strictly construed against the municipality that seeks to enforce it and because the of the property owner. He states that he does believe the definition of campground is not ambiguous definition states “quarters of any kind”. of future Ben Garvey resided that the board under the previous rezoning application that there were concerns use and spot zoning, but the application was withdrawn.

Chairman Doug Crow noted that he considered the plans well done and thought was put into the character of the community and stated that he has no problem with the nine units in the back of the campground, and to a point the spa and lodge, but does regarding the other nine units in a building that is in two zoning districts. He states his opinion that it is a sketch to consider half the units in a non-seasonal location and not in the Ag district. Tim Stroth stated that he does not fully understand:the intent of the lodge but understands that there is a fine line between uses and the conceptual intent. The low-resolution picture looks like a greenhouse, but what does it include, We should infer use as we must for the Special Use permit. Considering this building, under the previous application it was proposed to be a wedding venue, Chairman Doug Crow asked member Tim if he thinks he is against the applications or if it should be tabled, Tim Stroth responded he did not know. Multiple people talking. Chairman Doug Crow asked member Ben for his thoughts. Ben Garvey stated he struggles as well with the non-seasonal units. He believes that it fits into the criteria of what is being requested, but there is a tough line between the RR and Ag because it goes through the building. Chairman Doug Crow asked member Chris for his thoughts. Chris Contento stated he has no problem with the seasonal cottages and the treehouses. It is a good use of open space. He asked Asst. CEO Rich Miga whether if his house was in the Ag district, could he consider his house a camp and rent out sleeping quarters? Asst, CEO Richard Miga responded that from your example, I would say no, it couldn't because it's a single- family dwelling. If you're going to change it and not live there and try to change it in a manner where you're going to make it an area of this application, then that interpretation could change. Chris Contento asked if he has a treehouse on his property and lived there, can that be called sleeping quarters and treated as such? Asst. CEO Richard Miga responded that the treehouse would be accessory to the primary building on the property, which is a single-family house, so no. Chris Contento asked if a Special Use permit was to be considered, would there be any restrictions on events or social gatherings. Chairman Doug Crow stated the board could add conditions.

Chris Contento stated in spirit of trying to please the project and the adjoining neighbors, concerns were brought about traffic, the outbuilding, noise, parking, and wastewater, if the Special Use permit were to be granted as submitted, are they having weddings with two hundred people? Peter Sorgi noted that the occupant load will be based on the square footage and it is common to have condition on an application. He stated that he customized the applications to the code, but there can be conditions. New York State law allows conditions, and the Code Enforcement Officer must enforce them. Could they have a wedding, yes, but it would have to be accessory, and in his vision, th Gyre who would be hosting the event would have to be staying there. Cannot be a standalone thing. ( Chairman Doug Crow states that if for example that the sleepin; i : tybs, being used by the family of the wedding, and hundred people show up, that would be accessotiy aks St Peter Sorgi noted that they reviewed a database of eve: ; ie ground in Ms d what accessory uses are allowed and events are common, but where it would & it itside the scope of t] i if it was rented out just for ty the event, then it would cease to be accessory. % : Chairman Doug Crow asked member Norm Lis >». Norm Mertiman asked what is the risk if the a iy~ has nour ey iewed the application yet? Psy ing di i Chairman Doug Crow replied re uild : a nic it to the Town engineer. 7 aor 4 io} = E i Asst. CEO Richard Miga le thatthe ‘ie ug t Fl, Dproposed fee for the Town engineer to review the SWPPP in the nexxt ye board Norm Merriman2. unas | Oy oe Chairman doll ‘ow reiteratec a n » ved aSy, eve declaration and that there were no archaeological issues. Pending'th -off withbit 3 ti ns d getting their tax credits. : ra ly ..s agems they reg ect the h D orca nature of the property and find the proposed — Norm Merriman state applications as being hat teul : Pa cdtei! (ct events like bands? Tim Stroth interjected that, cart i a Asst. CEO Richard Miga noted that they can add conditions to the special use permit for outdoor music, noise, etcetera, that you deem to be in consideration of the Town board's approval. Chairman Doug Crow asks for a motion. Tim Stroth asked if there are not four votes, then goes the application go down? Chairman Doug Crow responded that basically means our recommendation to the Town Board is that they do not approve it.

Peter Sorgi asked if the board was a seven-person board? Chairman Doug Crow and Tim Strouth both responded, yes, Peter Sorgi noted he thought there were alternates and not a seven-person board. Chairman Doug Crow and Tim Strouth both responded, seven member and two alternates, Peter Sorgi stated that they were fine tabling this. It’s a fair thing, but we would have to go through the whole presentation again, so whatever the board wants to do. Chairman Doug Crow stated that we can make a motion for or against, and if against, the Town Board can decide whether they want to pursue or ask us to reconsider. Which has happened so we can articulate why. Peter Sorgi asked where the 300 feet of the Rural Residential district started. Asst. CEO Richard Miga replied that the district starts after the right-of-way (ROW). The ROW width is half the street width and is measured from the centerline of the street. After that width, the three hundred feet begins. Chairman Doug Crow reiterated that the board should rule in favor or against as they owe it to the applicant to try, but it appears to be a split. The other alternative is to table it. Norm Merriman stated that considering the property as it is now and has been for a while, let’s face it, it’s in decline, and believes it is a good way to use the property. It is harmless or nearly harmless to the whole community, and there seems to be a pledge that the property is going to be fixed up. Norm Merriman made a motion to the Planning Board to recommend to the Town Board to approve the Site Plan request as submitted for 1196 Big Tree Road SBL# 165,00-1-28.21 as presented by Sorgi & McCarthy, PLLC, for the redevelopment of the present site for a campground with a wellness theme and customarily incidental accessory-use structures. It would be a good additional to that portion of the Town and is pretty harmless. Ben Garvey amends the motion with the condition that the Building Department provide clarification that the main building is considered under the Agricultural zoning district for zoning ordinances and the rights there of, and not in the Rural Residential zoning district. Seconded by Ben Garvey Upon a vote being taken: Ayes- 3 Noes- 2 Motion denied.

Chairman Doug Crow stated the motion does not pass. The board could make a countermotion to recommend that they do not do it, but he does not believe that it will pass so it might be best suited to recommend this be tabled till our next meeting. We can move it to the Town Board and say we cannot make a decision, but they might not accept that and request that we try again with more people. Peter Sorgi asked with regard to the Special Use permit motion. Tim Stroth asked Asst. CEO Rich Miga, since the Site Plan did not pai a there a need to go through the Special Use permit? , Asst. CEO Richard Miga replied, yes. é Q . I. b Norm Mertitan made a motion to the Planning Board téih amend to a swn Board to approve the Special Use permit request as submitted for 1196 Big Tree Rg ISBL# 165.00-1-28.21 ae by Sorgi & McCarthy, PLLC, for the redevelopment of the present ] orac round with a ellness theme and customarily incidental accessory-use structures, ' : ali » Seconded by Ben Garvey with the same oof jously s tee, the site plan application. Upon a vote being taken Ayes- 3 ‘ ~" » Motion denied. Chairman Doug Crow restated dat c ' moti 8} id not have the needed four votes. The option to-table the application is +available, but thi a om ard, and the Town Board is the ultimate authority to ap HER schedule the publigl oa i wor dec i ih cation pppack to this board to review with more members to achi h all i uh Nh, ol Vd 0 achievet ‘« em a | :i ‘2 Peter Sorgi resp i fed that the roilosd | ie bh review this board’s findings and decide whether to proceed or send it back to thig be gard? = if Fe has seen them do that. eS 2 Be ! et g iS = r your time. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. OLD BUSINESS: Chairman Doug Crow stated that, with member Chelsea Root not being present in tonight’s meeting, the internal checklist she developed will not be reviewed and commented on tonight. Chairman Doug Crow made a motion to adjourn

Seconded by: Tim Stroth Upon a vote being taken: Ayes- 5 Noes- 0 Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:48 pm ext meeting scheduled will be Wednesday, March 1st, 7:00 p.m. at the Town Hall, 575 Oakwood Ayenue, East Aurora, New York

SUPERVISOR TOWN CLERK Charles D. Snyder Jeanne H. Viger (716) 652-7590 (716) 652-3280 [email protected] [email protected] TOWN OF AURORA Aurora Municipal Center 575 Oakwood Avenue, East Aurora, NY 14052 www.townofaurorany.cov To: Town Board Re: Purchase of New Salt Barn Please review the packet from Hybrid Buildings Solutions regarding the construction of a new salt barn. Thank you, David Gunner Highway Superintendent

ADDENDUM 1 ,AN HYBRID BUILDING SOLUTIONS 850 Main Road, Corfu, New York 14036 Office: 716-741-7416 Fax: 716-706-1403 www.hybridbuildingsolutions.com Certified WBE February 13, 2026 Sourcewell Price Accepted: David Gunner Color Selection:_ white Town of Aurora Client Initial: 251 Quaker Road Date: East Aurora, NY Dear David, Please accept the following proposal for your new salt storage building with our current pricing. Pricing valid until March 31, 2026. 72 feet wide by 100 feet long Calhoun Super Structures HT Series building, 10 foot on center truss spacing providing a snow load capability of 58 \bs. and a minimum wind load of 102 mph. This building would be engineered based on Low Hazard with a “C” Exposure based on 2020 NYS Codes Building to be erected on 9’8” frost-depth precast wall foundation 13.5 ounce Non-Fire-Retardant Elite fabric keder cover with individual panels between each truss One Elite Fabric Standard End with 4 passive vents Hot Dipped Galvanized Steel Anchor Bolts and Epoxy included Erected on site with OSHA certified, factory trained crew utilizing prevailing wages for Erie County Site Specific Engineered Drawings and Reactions included for building, foundation, and bolt connections Specific Geotechnical Requirements included All equipment and travel expenses included 25 Year Warranty on fabric Sourcewell Awarded Delivered to Site $449,943.00 Initial for Acceptance: Add 20’ Front Wall Return Pricing contingent on being completed at same time as building & foundation installation $25,766.00 Initial for Acceptance:

Proposal Subject to: e Ability of equipment to maneuver in and around perimeter of building safely « Site and a 20 foot perimeter of the site being level, compacted and drained so equipment can operate safely and effectively * No electrical, gas or water lines to be worked around. They must be clearly labeled. Not Included in the Above Estimate e Taxes (we would require a tax-exempt certificate} e Associated fees or permits * Site work/excavation @ Bonding ® Electrical and Heating requirements ® Building pad and stone, drainage e Paving of salt storage building e Engineering Calculations Package * Excavation of footers (we look to the town to assist with this task) Due to the potential for changes in tariffs and trade regulations, the prices quoted in this contract are subject to adjustment. if there are any increases or decreases in tariffs that affect the cost of materials or services, the contractor reserves the right to modify the contract price accordingly. Any adjustments will be communicated in writing and agreed upon by both parties prior to implementation. All of our buildings are Hot Dipped Galvanized, Post Fabrication. This means you have the full protection of HDG, inside and out, welds and all; nothing is exposed. Every building sold by Calhoun Super Structures is individually run through a 3D Finite Element Analysis using all the site and building specific information by 3" Party Engineers. This process allows us to see the amount of stress your building is under, anywhere on the structure, down to the size of a pin head. This type of engineering is the only true way to see how your building will perform in a 100 or 500-year storm. The building comes with a 25-year Warranty. Our building meets all OGS salt storage requirements. Thank you for this opportunity to provide you with a proposal. Please call us once you have had an opportunity to review it. Sincerely, Mart Loutse Merewa Mari Louise Merkwa Managing Member Cell Phone: 716-544-5872

ee CALHOUN January, 10 2025 Hybrid Building Solutions 850 Main St Corfu, NY 14036 RE: Sourcewell Contract# 071223-CLH Calhoun Super Structure’s Sourcewell contract was renewed in 2023 and was assigned a new contract number #071223-CLH. You can find our contact listing on the Sourcewell website (https://www.sourcewell-mn.gov/cooperative-purchasing/071223-clh). If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Regards iit Dan Dalzell Director of Sales and Operations Calhoun Super Structures (519) 777-0803 [email protected] OUR STRENGTH 1-800-265-3994 is iN OUR 1-519-934-3037 cath tructure, STRUCTURE, 3702 bruce road 10 Tara, Ontario NOH 2NO

TIT CALHOUN Aug 22, 2024 To: Hybrid Building Solutions 850 Main Street Corfu,NY 14036 From: Calhoun Super Structures 3702 Bruce Road 10 Tara,ON NOH 2NO Re: Sourcewell — Service package To whom it may concern, As part of our service package through Sourcewell, we provide a turnkey package which includes foundation engineering and install, along with the supply and install of the fabric membrane structure. Sincerely, SUC Daniel Daizell Director of Operations Calhoun Super Structures (519) 777-0803 [email protected] OUR STRENGTH 1-800-265-3994 IS IN OUR 1-519-934-3037 cath tructure. STRUCTURE, 2702 bruce Road 10 Tara, Ontario NOH 2NO

Joqey Jo juawyedad ayes 410A MON JOUOISSILULIOD uopreay eyeqoy 1 ae FIA (asoge pauren IOpPeDUED aq Joj ATWO PTA St ast] STL) 6Z-eT-9z0z ‘ale uolendxy v0-ZT-7Z0Z ‘anss| Jo ayeq YO-67SE9-7~ JEqUINN uoHeNsIbeYy OTPLTVLOTZ -4eqQUINN euod 9EOVT HOA MEN ‘NOD pa UW 0S8 OTT ‘suonnjos Burpying puqAH g apnty Mey Joge'T SAN jo sjuatemmbay adem, SUTTeAaTg arp 0} Delqns yo A MAN Jo aJeIS aq] UT sjoalo1g UOTONAsUOD aleatig paiaaor, pue ¥I0OM I]qhd Uo pig pue UO}Ieg 0} Jeplopy] ey sapnug seoynieD smL NOLLVULSIDAY YUOLOVALNOYD AO ALVOMLLYa) QZZZT AN ‘ANWSTY ‘ZT ONIGTING ‘SNdWVD 3dIdAQ ALVES “LINN SLVOISILYZO ONY SSNSOIT HLWSH ONY ALS3¥S 40 NOISIAIG doqge] jo 3LWis WEOA ———— quowyiedag AGN 10d 4YNOA AUV 3M

quouniopsag amg Bac lo uOISING F quowdopaag ssousng PUR | ncaa SUMGLUOAA JO UOISIAI | wo. aN Aquoun,) SL€6S “4 ita 6z0z ‘E OUNP :e}eq uONedXy ye0d ‘€ SuNP :Ue papueMy UGHeoUNIED O71 ‘suoynjog Burpjing piigh} LOL WG] Spomy ‘me SAINDeXy ee} YOA MEN O} JUeNsINd (3 gm) esiudisjug SsauIisng UsWOA, e sjuei6 jUSUdojeAeq ssousng $,usWOA”A pue AjoUT,] Jo UOISIAIC SauetUdOIeAeq Ss12ig eudwy NOILLVOIeILYA9D Som gh ot “ALVLS MYOA

Form W-9 Request for Taxpayer Give form to the {Flev, March 2024) Identification Number and Certification requester. Do not Departmant of the Treasury send to the IRS, Internal Ravenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/FormW for instructions and the latest information. Before you begin. For guidance related to the purpose of Form W-9, see Purposa of Form, below, 1 Name of entlly/individual. An entry is required, (For a sole proprietor ar disregarded entity, enter the owner's name on tine 1, and enter the businass/disregarded antity's name on lina 2.) Hybrid Building Solutions, LLC 2 Business name/disregardad entity name, If differant trom above. é 3a Check the appropriate box for federal tax classification of the entity/individual whose name is entered on ine i. Check | 4 Examptlons (codes apply only to Y only one of the following seven boxes. cartain entitles, not individuals; tl a § Q Individual/sole proprietor O C corporation oO S corporation oO Parinership oO Trust/astate ses instructions on page 8} a? LLG, Enter the tax classification (CG = C corporation, S = S corporation, P = Partnership) 5... 8 Exempt payee code (if any) ES & Note: Check the “LLO” box above and, In the entry space, enter the appropriate coda (C, 8, or P) for the tax a classification of the LLC, unless It is a disregarded entity, A disregarded entity should Instead check the appropriate | Exemption from Forelgn Account Tax 5 § box for the tax classification of its owner. Gampliance Act (FATCA) reporting pe 5 & Ol Other (see Instructions) code (if any) Lan §§ | 3b ff on line 8a you checked “Partnership” or “Trusestate," or checked “LLC” and entered “P" as Its tax olasslfication, A and you are providing this form to a partnership, trust, or estate in which you have an ownership Interest, check ode the Ure eee f) this box If you have any foreign partners, owners, or beneficlarles, See Instructions , rr rrr " 3 5 Address (nurniber, streat, and apt. or sulte no). See Instruotions, Requester's name and address (optional) 850 Main Road 6 City, state, and ZIP code Corfu, NY 14036 7 List account number(s) here (optianal) Taxpayer Identification Number {TIN) Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. The TIN provided must mateh the name given on line 1 ta avoid [ Social security number backup withholding, For individuals, this is generally your social security number (GSN). However, for a resident allen, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the instructions for Part J, later, For other 7 - entities, it is your employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a or TIN, later. Employer Identitication number Note: If the account is in more than one name, see the instructions for IIne 1. See also What Name and Number To Give the Requester for guidelines on whose number to enter. 217/-[4]/5/9/8)6]6]4 Certification Under penalties of perjury, | certify that: 1. The number shawn on this form Is my correct taxpayer identification number (or | am walting for a number to be Issued to me); and 2.1am nat subject to backup withholding bacause (a) | am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) | have not been notified by the internal Revenue Service (IRS) that | am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or {c) the IRS has notified me that | am no longer subject to backup withholding; and 3.1am a U.S. cltizan or other U.S. person (defined below); and 4. The FATCA code(s) enterad on this form (if any) indicating that | am exempt from FATCA reporting Is correct. Gertification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been nolifled by the IRS that you ara currently subject to backup withholding because you have falled to repart all interest and dividends on your tax return, For real estate transactions, Item 2 does not apply, For mortgage interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and, generally, payments other than Interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the cextification, but you must provide your correct TIN. Ses the instructtons for Part li, later, Sign Here sake NO UNO ncahl cee ow O8 (A (BOSS General Instructions New line 3b has been added to this form, A flow-through entity is required to complete this lina to Indicate that it has direct or indirect Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries when It provides the Form W-9 noted. to anather flow-through entity in which It has an ownership interest. This Future developments, For the latest informailon about developments change Is Intended to provide a flow-through entity with information related to Form W-9 and its Instructions, such as legislation enacted ragarding the status of its indlrect foreign partners, owners, or after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/FormW9. beneficiaries, so that It can satisfy any applicable reporting requirements. For example, a partnarship that has any Indirect forelgn What’s New partners may be required to complete Schadules K-2 and K-3, Sea the Partnership Instructions for Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Form 1065). Line 3a has been modified to clarify how a disregarded entity completes this tine, An LLC that Is a disregarded entity shauld check the Purpose of Form appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner, Otherwise, It shauld chack the “LLG” box and enter its appropriate tax classification. An individual or entity (Form W-9 requester} who Is required to file an information return with the IFS Is giving you this form because they Cat, No, 10281X Form W-9 Rev, 38-2024)

BR “oe 20n1Ny er) BxpsrwoNd SNOo 1H Ze\STIRH $107\OHO SLO 30} 41'-5 1/2" hig |gol2 70'-41" (0-0 BASE PLATES) 5/8" THK PLATE @= 3/8" ANCHOR BOLT] 6/8" THICK PLATE. @= 3/4" ANCHOR BOLT 5/8" THICK PLATE @= 3/4" ANCHOR BOLT r (=) fe) ay ‘Catnoun Superstructure Ltd. aT 4 [jive @ CALHOUN S& = 200-265-3094 ah safeDa ep 8 ae ey wve a7posja+ @. & 9 2 woe swe 124 ssh oo M2yee-sar wore vpsron| 72" HT PROFILE 1 aptean/e* ON CONCRETE WALL ‘sorte. Do ¢ DETAIL A. BASE ELEVATION = 108-07 DETAR A. BASE ELEVATION = 198°-0" DETAIL A BASE ELEVATION = 108'-0" DESCRIPTION REVISION / ISSUE DATE saidaiDd) NTs HT-72 Sa 0F7

benefit corporation of the State, with the know ledge or belief that it will be filed with or recor State or any political subdivision, public authority ded by the or public benefit corporation of the State, constitute crime under New York State Law. s a Charles Snyder Net New Jobs No job answers necessary due to your associated programs. Qualified Investments No investment answers necessary due to your associated programs. Project Totals Total project cost: $ 607,555 Funding Requested from Program Program Amount Requested Water Quality Improvement Project (WQIP) Program $ 486044 Program Budget Water Quality Improvement Project (WGIP) Program Use Source Status Amount Indicate Source / Comments Salaries and In-Kind Secured $98375 — Local Town of Aurora Highway Department funding Wages for personnel to implement site preparations, excavati on of site and building footers, construction of pad, a nd other building related expenses Program Admin In-Kind Secured $23136 — Local Town of Aurora Highway Department funding istration for personnel for project administration and constructi on oversight Contractuala DEC - Water Quali Requesting i $438994 Funding from the WQIP grant will fund contractor (H nd/or Consultantdy Improvement Pro n this Applicati ybrid Building Solutions) for the construction of the 7, ject on 200 sq. ft. replacement salt storage building Machinery and DEC - Water Quali Requestingi $47050 FI unding from the WQIP grant will fund equipment fr Equipment ty Improvement Pro n this Applicati om Central Equipment of CNY, LLC. for brine system - ject on tanks, pipes, pumps, etc. Atlachment Questions & Answers Water Quality Improvement Project (WQIP) Program Q_17511 REQUIRED for all applications if the project is wholly or partially within a 0.2% (500 year) or 1% (100 year) annual chance of occurrence floodplain, attach a floodplain map with the NYS CFA - Application Number 149046 Page 20 of 28

SPN ERAL LQUIPMEN TE OF CNY, INC P.O, BOX 507, 1261 LOW PA TH ROAD 4 2 PORT BYRON, NY £4140 _ Estimate PRONE: 315.776.5300, LAX: 34 $.776.8800 F timate a | INFO CENTRAL@YVAL! O.COM an w02s { 3505 WWW.CENTRAL I ‘QUIPMI INTLLC.COM bean: — eet cake tr Name / Addreag Fie ee Set Sth a tanita Ship To LOWN GF AURORA eva Sonne onaee a pantmngeintanmion | 291 QUAKER ROAD at AURORA. FAST AURORA, NV 14082 i QUARTER ROAB EAST AURORA, NY 14052 Customer Phone Rep Terma Tit 632-4050 Net 30 ¢ were seseepinenaed len Description Qty Rate MIKE 716269565289 = EDEVESO @ LOWNOL AURORA COM max system dimes LO long x @ wide gas or hyd protons white/natural aver yellow F4IOLONC GODS 3000 GALLON VERTICAL TANK £02" x97" TAL te 18" 2 3,388.95 HD AND 3" FITTING WITH SIPHON THBE AND STRESS. - RELIEVER, 1.5 SPECIFIC GRAVITY, AND 3 ve AR I WARRANTY a 1062000098106 5000 GALLON YELLOW VERTICAL- TANK. toa x 156" TALI wr ig" LID AND 3° £' (TING WHT B YTS1S0-102 FMIGI0-78C PS1610-HP FPSI610-SKC DISCOUNT 200PHY

BRD WI eeD wore a oe PORT TRYR BY ON,RON,NY NVI 13140 s —— 6.8800 PHONE: 314.776.5300, FAX: 315.77 [07 LLC WWw. CEkNT Wwc a QUIP NTRALE MEN MDME NTLLC.COM 42095 6 ¥3509 Name / Address - Ship To 79 NO TOW NGr a FAROB E FOWNOF : AURE IRA 247 QUAKER ROAD BAST AnD soon FAST AURORA. NY 14052 Customer Phone Rep von - wise 116 652-4050 Description : ay Kem fot in stock approx lead time 8 to 10 weeks fob factory, CAMION IMT995G 995 GALLON ORANGE LIQUID. Y T-SERIES 120" X 72" X 75", APPROX 10351 WEIGHT, STAINLESS FRAME WITH BUILT. I SLOTS & 4pe TIE DOWN SLOTS, 160 GP. ELECTRIC START GAS POWERED 2" PO! ELECTRIC VALVES WITH THREE ON/OFF.SW CAB CONTROL, #2:NOZZLE ICE CONTROL DOUBE) BOOM (MAX SPRAY: 45 GPM, UP TO 30' SPRAY. AND HOSE REEL WITH. 100' HOSE AND: ADJUSTABLE SPRAY GUN, WORK LIGHT. MOUNTING BRACKETS, 2"RECIEVER HI MOUNT : SHIPPING / DELIVE.. approx SHIPPING / DELIVERY FEE GO) °* PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE **

Town of Aurora | Town Board Meeting | March 9, 2026 Draft Minutes from the Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Randy West, Village Planning Commission, 134 Buffalo Road e Thanked the Town Board for allowing the village to participate in the comprehensive plan process and in a comment session with the consultant, though later than desired. e Said he regrets the village was not involved earlier, but clarified that was not the Town Board's fault and was their own decision. Jackie Hienrich, 488 Snyder Road e Praised the committee for the time and effort put into adapting a boilerplate comprehensive plan to fit Aurora. e Said Snyder Road and Luther Road were left out of traffic calming discussions, despite heavy and growing traffic from early morning through evening, with cut- Ih traffic copal multiple surroundi iti r, electric, police, and firé Road as examples of significant prior development. Ed Hutton, 20 Reed Hill Drive e Complimented the plan and noted that different paris of Aurora have different needs. e Said Reed Hill is a well-developed part of town located very close to the village, but access to the village, Knox Park, and sidewalks is difficult because sidewalks end near Jeweit Holmwood/Route 20A, e Called that area a safety and access problem and said it should be addressed sooner rather than in the 3 to 5 year timeframe mentioned in the plan. e« Suggested improvements such as sidewalks, striping, or roadway reconfiguration to better connect Reed Hill residents to village amenities.

Town of Aurora | Town Board Meeting | March ?, 2026 Michele Bjella, 370 South Park Place e Expressed general support for the comprehensive plan. e Said comprehensive planning is a major undertaking and important given climate change, natural disasters, and future community neecs. e Congratulated the board on the work and said she is especially interested in how the plan's ideas will be implemented. Douglas Crow, Planning Board Chairman, 1951 Davis Road, West Falls e Said the Planning Board discussed the comprehensive plan extensively and unanimously supports adoption of the plan as written. e Said the Planning Board submitted, or would soon submit, a letter with more detailed implementation recommendations, e Highlighted priority implementation items: 1. expand ADUs in appropriate parts of town through zoning changes acarly-finishhed battery energy storage plan- the first six months, before a full zoning code audit and-broader code revisions. Written submission: Bill Lesley, 1878 Emery Road, South Wales e Suggested adding the New York State Open Conservation Plan and the New York State Wildlife Action Plan to the list of relevant planning documents. e Asked whether outreach to flood-prone properties should also involve DEC Flood Plain Management staff in Buffalo. « Pointed out that the plan incorrectly states that the east and west branches of Cazenovia Creek join in the Village of East Aurora, and said they actually join in the Town of Aurora. e Asked whether the plan should: oe include honey production by beekeepers o encourage LEED certification for new town buildings o expand the hamlet overlay to include portions of South Wales in the Town of Aurora, specifically parts of Emery Road, Willis Avenue, and Olean Road

Town of Aurora | Town Board Meeting | March 9, 2026 e Suggested adding implementation partners including Erie County Parks, Recreation and Forestry, the Greater Buffalo Niagara Transportation Council, the New York State Depariment of Environmental Conservation, and the New York Power Authority, particularly for Emery Park, flood mitigation, complete streets, neighborhood connectivity, and EV charging infrastructure. Written submission: Rachel Krajewski, 16 Church Street, Carner Development Group e Wrote as a resident, business owner, and property owner in both the town and village. e Said the plan does not provide enough detail on combining agricultural and rural residential uses, and worried that doing so could reduce flexibility needed to repurpose historic buildings no longer practical as single-family homes. e Noted that several large historic houses have struggled to sell in recent years and questioned whether single-family buyers will realistically purchase and rehabilitate them. 1e West Fall: