Text · page 2 of 5
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
Page 2 Zoning Board Meeting September 9, 2026 At this time, the Zoning Board of Appeals went over the factors considered in their decision: FACTORS CONSIDERED: 1. Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties: Yes. No(4) 2. Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance: Yes__ No (4) 3. Whether the requested variance is substantial: Yes (4) No 4, Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood: Yes No_(4) 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance: Yes_(1) No (3) DETERMINATION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that the benefit to the applicant DOES outweigh the detriment to the neighborhood or community. The variance request is approved. Next on the agenda, Public Hearing #11398 was opened at 7:07 p.m. for a variance for accessory building to be placed in front yard 220 S Central Ave. in Zoning District R-8.5 for Kyle Wright.