Southtowns Record

East Aurora Union Free School District - Procurement (2023M-125)

Government
East Aurora Union Free School District
Posted by publisher
Jan 5, 2024
Kind
State audit
Topics
Audits and oversight

Publisher's summary

The Board of Education (Board) and District officials did not always procure goods and services in a competitive manner. Officials did not update the procurement policy or ensure that employees followed New York State General Municipal Law (GML) when procuring goods and services. As a result, goods and services were purchased without the benefit of competition, resulting in the increased risk that taxpayer dollars were not expended in the most prudent and economical manner.

Original document

Text · page 6 of 13

the amount of paper purchased in prior years, they would have realized that the
District spent more than $20,000 a year on copy paper. The Assistant Director
told us that due to prior shipping and handling concerns with the State contract
vendor, they did not want to buy from the State contract vendor. However,  The District’s
District officials did not comply with GML Section 103 because this purchase was  procurement
required to be competitively bid and officials did not use the vendor awarded the
State contract.  policy did
The Business Administrator, who was also the Board-appointed purchasing agent,  not outline
agreed that both purchases should have been advertised and competitively bid,  the specific
but she did not confirm that purchases were in compliance with GML. Instead, the
Business Administrator relied on officials in each department to ensure purchases  methods of
complied with GML. Although the District’s procurement process is decentralized,
  procurement
with many officials seeking competition and making their own purchases, these
officials may not be aware of the aggregate amount of goods being purchased  to be used,
across the District or have sufficient knowledge of the laws or policies governing
purchasing. Ultimately, the Board is responsible for ensuring that officials comply
  such as
with GML competitive bidding requirements. As such, it is essential that the  quotes or
Board, or the Board-appointed purchasing agent, monitor purchases to ensure
they are in compliance with GML.  RFPs, or
  the dollar
Officials Did Not Procure Goods and Services in a Competitive
Manner
  thresholds
  for when
We reviewed 48 purchase and public works contracts totaling $443,734 that were
not subject to statutory bid requirements to determine whether District officials  quotes will be
procured them in a competitive manner. The District’s procurement policy did not
outline the specific methods of procurement to be used, such as quotes or RFPs,  obtained or
or the dollar thresholds for when quotes will be obtained or RFPs will be issued.  RFPs will be
In addition, the procurement policy did not outline any specific situations in which
District officials will not seek competition for procuring goods and services under  issued.
certain circumstances, as well as any instances where officials could choose a
vendor that did not submit the lowest bid or dollar value. As such, District officials
either chose not to obtain competitive pricing prior to purchasing goods and
services, or they did not retain documentation to demonstrate that quotes were
obtained. Examples include:2
  l Seven purchases of various printing and graphic services, including
  school flyers, calendars, newsletters and other items totaling $54,413. The
  respective department heads told us they did not obtain quotes because
  these vendors were local and purchasing from them was convenient.

2 Totals represent the combined total of like purchases made during both the 2021-22 and 2022-23 fiscal
years.

4  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller