Southtowns Record

Town of West Seneca - Capital Project Management (2019M-195)

Government
Town of West Seneca
Posted by publisher
Mar 6, 2020
Kind
State audit
Topics
Budget and taxes, Audits and oversight, Parks and recreation

Publisher's summary

The Board did not properly plan and manage the capital project and clearly inform taxpayers when the estimated cost and scope of the project changed. In addition, the Board was not fully transparent on the anticipated project costs. As a result, original estimates were $9.8 million and increased by more than $3.6 million after competitive bids were received. When inaccurate costs are included in project estimates, there is an increased risk that the Board may issue more debt than necessary to finance the project because funding is available to pay for costs that were not within the original project scope. Finally, Town officials did not ensure an itemized project budget outlining revenues and expenditures was maintained in the accounting records and periodically updated.

Original document

Text · page 7 of 14

After construction began, on January 18, 2018, the Board adopted a bond
resolution, subject to permissive referendum,6 authorizing additional financing
for the project with a revised estimated maximum cost of $14.9 million, or $5.1
million more than the initial cost estimate. The plan of financing included the
issuance of up to $5.1 million in serial bonds, in addition to the $8.4 million in
bonds previously authorized by the May 23, 2016 bond resolution, application of
$1.4 million in energy performance contract funding and application of $1.6 million
in grant funds expected from the State. Total financing sources included in this
resolution totaled $16.5 million (more than the project’s estimated maximum cost
indicated in the resolution by approximately $1.6 million). Officials did not prepare
a detailed itemized budget in connection with this bond resolution to demonstrate
the reason for the increase in the estimated cost.

While the Board established financing sources needed to fund the project,
only the initial revenue and appropriation budget entries were recorded in the
accounting system. Subsequent budget changes were not recorded in the
system. As a result, up-to-date budget status reports could not be prepared.
Consequently, the Board was unable to effectively monitor the project by ensuring
financing sources were sufficient to fund expenditures or that the budget was
always in balance. After appointment in September 2017, the Director of Finance
manually prepared spreadsheets that were used by the Board and Town officials
to monitor the project.

Following the adoption of the January 18, 2018 bond resolution, in February 2018,
the Board was petitioned by residents seeking a referendum on that resolution. In
light of the petition, the Board passed a resolution on February 26, 2018 stopping
any further project expenditures, and directing the Town Attorney, the Director of
Finance and the Town’s engineering firm to work with outside counsel, outside
accountants and project contractors to provide a report and recommendations
concerning the project, including the status of construction, costs incurred, legal
obligations and available savings from changes in the scope of work, among
other things.

Before the referendum could be held, the Board adopted a resolution on March
12, 2018 to rescind the January 18, 2018 bond resolution. As a result, residents
were unable to vote on that particular borrowing authorization. At the March 12,
2018 meeting, the Board adopted another bond resolution, subject to permissive
referendum, with an estimated maximum project cost to be approximately $13.4
million.

The revised financing plan included the issuance of up to $1.9 million in serial
bonds in addition to the $8.4 million bonds previously authorized by the May 23,
2016 resolution, application of $1.4 million in energy performance contract funding

6 This resolution was subsequently rescinded, as discussed below.

  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller  5