Southtowns Record

West Seneca Central School District - Community Education (2019M-241)

Government
West Seneca Central School District
Posted by publisher
Mar 6, 2020
Kind
State audit
Topics
Audits and oversight

Publisher's summary

District officials did not review or reconcile electronic payments with cash receipts records to verify that all amounts were collected and remitted to the District. As a result, the District did not initially receive more than $5,500 in fees recorded as collected but not remitted by a vendor in January 2019. In November 2019, the vendor agreed to fully reimburse the District for lost revenue. In addition, the Board did not adopt written enforcement policies for overdue accounts and the Coordinator did not ensure overdue accounts were invoiced in a timely manner. We reviewed an accounts receivable aging report for the before and after school program and identified 75 accounts with outstanding balances totaling almost $28,000 as of August 13, 2019.

Original document

Text · page 11 of 14

Appendix B: Audit Methodology and Standards

We conducted this audit pursuant to Article V, Section 1 of the State Constitution
and the State Comptroller’s authority as set forth in Article 3 of the New York
State General Municipal Law. To achieve the audit objective and obtain valid audit
evidence, our audit procedures included the following:
  ll We interviewed District officials and employees to gain an understanding of
  Department operations and the cash receipts process. We also reviewed
  Board meeting minutes, program brochures and vendor contracts.
  ll We focused our review on January 2019 because the continuing education
  winter 2019 semester was the last semester that was finalized at the time
  our audit commenced.
  ll We reviewed program fees totaling $92,000 collected in January 2019 by
  both Department personnel and third-party vendors. We reviewed cash
  and check payments totaling approximately $9,000 collected by District
  personnel. We compared these payments to daily collection reports, deposit
  slips and the District treasurer’s receipts. We reviewed electronic payments
  totaling $83,000 processed by third-party vendors. We compared amounts
  remitted by the vendors to electronic payments recorded in daily revenue
  reports and system generated monthly summary reports.
  ll We compared the accounts receivable aging report generated from third-
  party software on August 13, 2019, to invoices mailed out to before and
  after school program customers on August 15, 2019, to assess whether
  accounts with outstanding balances were invoiced accurately. We reviewed
  all accounts with balances that were not invoiced.

We conducted this performance audit in accordance with GAGAS (generally
accepted government auditing standards). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.
We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.

Unless otherwise indicated in this report, samples for testing were selected
based on professional judgment, as it was not the intent to project the results
onto the entire population. Where applicable, information is presented concerning
the value and/or size of the relevant population and the sample selected for
examination.

The Board has the responsibility to initiate corrective action. A written corrective
action plan (CAP) that addresses the findings and recommendations in this report
must be prepared and provided to our office within 90 days, pursuant to Section
35 of General Municipal Law, Section 2116-a(3)(c) of New York State Education
Law and Section 170.12 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. To
the extent practicable, implementation of the CAP must begin by the end of the

  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller  9