Southtowns Record

Village of Gowanda - Sewer Financial Operations (2019M-199)

Government
Village of Gowanda
Posted by publisher
Dec 20, 2019
Kind
State audit
Topics
Water, sewer and drainage, Audits and oversight, Budget and taxes

Publisher's summary

Because the Board did not adopt realistic budgets, the sewer fund incurred operating deficits and a decline in its overall financial health. The Board overestimated revenues by $379,000 in fiscal years 2014-15 through 2018-19, resulting in net operating deficits in the sewer fund totaling $144,000. The Board also did not annually review contractual revenues, resulting in potential unrealized revenue totaling approximately $295,000. Finally, the Board did not document a basis for, or adequately monitor, shared service costs, resulting in possible sewer fund inequities. However, with rate increases in effect and the adoption of more realistic revenue estimates in 2018-19 and 2019-20, there has been marked improvement.

Original document

Text · page 8 of 14

The Sewer Fund’s Financial Condition Is Improving
The sewer fund experienced operating deficits in two of the last five fiscal years
and used a portion of its reserves to fund operations. The largest operating deficit,
totaling approximately $231,000, occurred in 2016-17 and was caused, in part, by
unanticipated equipment repairs totaling $71,000.

 Figure 3: Sewer Fund – Results of Operations
  2014-15  2015-16  2016-17  2017-18  2018-19  Totals
 Actual Revenues  $639,322  $757,930  $698,523  $835,440  $837,222  $3,768,437
 Actual Expendituresa  $688,989  $751,423  $929,220  $798,764  $744,064  $3,912,460
 Operating Surplus/(Deficit)  ($49,667)  $6,507  ($230,697)  $36,676  $93,158  ($144,023)
 a We increased the 2014-15 expenditures by $13,214 and reduced the 2015-16 expenditures by $11,492 to account for recording
 errors. We also increased expenditures in 2016-17 by $35,754 as noted previously.

A key measure of the Village’s financial condition is its level of fund balance.
The sewer fund had a total fund balance of approximately $514,000 as of June
1, 2014, which decreased by $144,000 (28 percent) over a five-year period to
approximately $370,000 because of the operating deficits. The majority of total
fund balance, more than $230,000 (62 percent), has been restricted in reserves
for capital improvements and equipment.

Board minutes indicated that the sewer fund’s financial condition has fluctuated.
For example, in October 2015, the prior Treasurer indicated that because of
DOCCS payments the sewer fund was “healthy” while the October 2016 minutes
stated the sewer fund was spending more than it was taking in. In February
2017 a member of the finance committee stated the sewer fund was struggling
financially. The Village issued revenue anticipation notes (RAN) in February
2015 ($500,000) and March 2016 ($350,000) to alleviate cash flow issues in
the general, water and sewer funds.8 However, the sewer fund still did not have
enough operating cash to pay its obligations.

As of February 24, 2016, the sewer fund’s operating bank accounts were nearly
depleted and cash balances had dwindled to $894. To cover documented
outstanding expenditures as of this date, which totaled approximately $16,100,
the prior Treasurer transferred $25,000 from the capital reserve account. Capital
reserve funds9 are statutorily restricted and typically cannot be used in this
manner. We found no indication that the Board approved this transfer and the
funds have not been returned to the reserve. In April 2017, the Board approved

8 Proceeds were deposited into a combined operating bank account with $25,000 of RAN proceeds recorded
as transferred to the sewer operating account in April 2016.

9 New York State General Municipal Law Sections 6-c and 6-g stipulate how capital reserves can be
established, funded and used. Capital reserves are used to finance all or part of the cost of construction,
reconstruction, or acquisition of a capital improvement or the acquisition of equipment.

6  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller