Southtowns Record

Hamburg Central School District - Continuing Education (2019M-11)

Government
Hamburg Central School District
Posted by publisher
Jul 3, 2019
Kind
State audit
Topics
Audits and oversight

Publisher's summary

We examined the continuing education department's cash receipts activity and found weaknesses in procedures. We found no significant discrepancies when comparing participant registration forms to cash receipts recorded in the Department's revenue ledger and to bank deposits. However, without duplicate press-numbered, itemized receipts, there is no assurance that all course registration fees paid to the Department were properly accounted for. Further, both the Coordinator and the clerk perform, or have access to perform, all of the same functions in the cash receipts process. As a result, incompatible duties (of receiving and having access to undeposited cash receipts and updating participant registrations and class rosters) were not properly segregated or mitigated by sufficient monitoring and oversight. These exceptions occurred because the Board did not establish a written policy and District officials did not develop detailed procedures to provide guidance for the Department on how to properly account for and handle cash receipts.

Original document

Text · page 6 of 15

found numerous untimely deposits. For example, we found that 52 checks totaling
$3,055 were deposited between 11 and 30 days later than the receipt date.

We then expanded this testing to include all 17 participant check payments
totaling $985 deposited between March 1, 2017 and May 31, 2017 that were not
already examined in the original eight courses. While we found no significant
exceptions with the majority of these deposits, we noticed that two checks were
received by the Business Office and subsequently deposited 73 and 84 days after
the Department indicated they were received on the registration form.

On further review, we found that the Department previously requested the
Business Office to issue a refund to the payers for both of these items because
the corresponding classes were canceled. However, the Department had not yet
submitted the checks to the Business Office for deposit. As a result, the Business
Office issued refunds for payments that had not yet been deposited.

The Business Office maintains a spreadsheet containing an itemized description
of all items the Department forwards to them for deposit including identification of
the form of payment, (e.g., cash, check or money order) and if the payment was
in the form of check or money order number, the date, payer name, amount and
date the Business Office receives the item is also included. We traced all 253
items totaling $13,769 received by the Business Office from the Department back
to the Department’s handwritten summary of total amounts of cash and checks
that was forwarded for all 34 of the spring 2017 semester courses offered and
noted no significant exceptions regarding the total dollar amounts or form of the
cash receipt.

The Department did not remit all receipts for deposit in a timely manner or record
the collection of all receipts in a press-numbered, duplicate receipts book that
was routinely reviewed by an individual outside of the collection process. As
a result, the District has an increased risk that cash receipts could be lost or
misappropriated without detection.

What Do We Recommend?
The Board and District officials should:

  1.  Develop and adopt written policies and procedures for collecting,
  processing, recording and depositing Department cash receipts.

  2.  Ensure that Department duties are adequately segregated or implement
  compensating controls such as increased supervisory review of the
  Department’s work and a periodic reconciliation of the Department’s
  cash receipts activity by someone independent of the Department’s cash
  receipts process, such as the Treasurer.

4  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller