Southtowns Record

Lackawanna City School District - Contractual Services (2019M-23)

Government
Lackawanna City School District
Posted by publisher
Jun 7, 2019
Kind
State audit
Topics
Audits and oversight, Budget and taxes

Publisher's summary

The District paid nine professional service providers $8.3 million during the 2017-18 school year for various services. We found that the District had Board-approved contracts or agreements on file for all nine service providers. Payments to the service providers were generally made at the appropriate rates and in accordance with contract provisions. However, we found payments to two service providers totaling $477,000 (10 percent) were not supported by sufficient documentation to ascertain that services were rendered in accordance with the contract. The District paid $275,000 for information technology support services even though the claims lacked descriptions of the services provided and documentation demonstrating how the rate of compensation was determined or by whom. We also found that invoices submitted by the occupation and physical therapy service provider totaling $202,000 were not sufficiently itemized or detailed to support all hours billed.

Original document

Text · page 7 of 10

Appendix B: Audit Methodology and Standards

We conducted this audit pursuant to Article V, Section 1 of the State Constitution
and the State Comptroller’s authority as set forth in Article 3 of the New York State
General Municipal Law. To achieve the audit objective2 and obtain valid audit
evidence, our audit procedures included the following:
  ll We interviewed District personnel to obtain an understanding of policies and
  procedures for the oversight of service contracts.
  ll We reviewed documentation on file, interviewed appropriate officials and
  reviewed Board minutes to identify all contractual service providers paid
  during the 2017-18 school year and determined that the District paid nine
  service providers approximately $8.3 million. We selected all payments
  totaling more than $4.3 million made to eight providers and judgmentally
  selected payments totaling $275,000 made to the ninth provider based on
  risks identified during our audit survey. The District had multiple contracts
  with this service provider with payments totaling nearly $4 million. The
  majority of these contracts were for support services commonly provided to
  school districts by this service provider and were deemed low risk based on
  our knowledge of this provider and school district operations.
  ll We reviewed all invoices and supporting documentation on file to ensure
  payments were properly supported, contained sufficient evidence that
  services were rendered and payments were made in accordance with written
  agreements. Where sufficient documentation was not on file, we worked with
  District officials to obtain additional documentation from service providers
  and verified that services were rendered and payments were appropriate.
  We also reviewed inventory records and scanned devices logged onto the
  District’s network to ensure that billing for information technology services
  was reasonable.
  ll We compared the amounts billed for services to the written agreements to
  ensure that the District paid the appropriate rates.

We conducted this performance audit in accordance with GAGAS (generally
accepted government auditing standards). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.
We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.

Unless otherwise indicated in this report, samples for testing were selected
based on professional judgment, as it was not the intent to project the results
onto the entire population. Where applicable, information is presented concerning
the value and/or size of the relevant population and the sample selected for
examination.

2 We also issued a separate audit report, Lackawanna City School District – Tuition (2019M-59).

  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller  5