Southtowns Record

Town of Eden - Real Property Tax Exemptions (2018M-231)

Government
Town of Eden
Posted by publisher
Mar 15, 2019
Kind
State audit
Topics
Audits and oversight, Budget and taxes

Publisher's summary

We reviewed 58 out of 765 (8 percent) agricultural, veterans and senior citizen exemptions, totaling $2.9 million, on properties with a total assessed value of $7.7 million. We found that 20 exemptions (34 percent), totaling $1.4 million, were not properly supported by adequate documentation to establish and/or maintain exemption eligibility. We reviewed 21 agricultural exemptions totaling $1.36 million on properties with assessed values of $3.6 million. Fourteen exemptions valued at $927,000 lacked one or more pieces of supporting documentation to verify eligibility. We also reviewed 22 veteran exemptions totaling $921,000 on properties with assessed values of approximately $2.5 million. Six exemptions totaling $480,000 lacked the required supporting documentation. Finally, we reviewed 15 senior citizen exemptions totaling $600,000 on properties with assessed values of $1.6 million and found that they were generally properly supported.

Original document

Text · page 11 of 14

Appendix D: Audit Methodology and Standards

We conducted this audit pursuant to Article V, Section 1 of the State Constitution
and the State Comptroller’s authority as set forth in Article 3 of the New York
State General Municipal Law. To achieve the audit objective and obtain valid audit
evidence, our audit procedures included the following:
  ll We reviewed Board minutes and applicable State and local legislation to
  gain an understanding of our audit scope.
  ll We inquired with the Assessors and Town officials about the exemption
  process and recordkeeping requirements.
  ll We obtained the 2017 Town tax roll (roll) and compared it with the exemption
  report from the Real Property System (System), administered by the
  New York State Office of Real Property Tax Services and updated by the
  local Assessors, to determine whether the population of exemptions and
  corresponding dollar values were the same. The exemption population was
  the same on both the roll and the System report in total and for the sample
  exemptions that we traced. As a result, we determined the roll data was
  reliable to use for our audit sample selection.
  ll We reviewed the 2017 tax roll to determine the total number and
  corresponding dollar amount of agricultural, veteran and senior citizen
  exemptions, as it was the most recently completed tax roll during our audit
  period. The roll reported over 960 agricultural, veteran and senior citizen
  exemptions valued at more than $18 million on properties with a total
  assessed value of $74 million. We reduced this total population by 195
  exemptions that totaled $1.2 million, on properties with assessed values
  totaling $20 million, because each exemption was valued at $10,000 or
  less and had a minimal impact on the overall tax levy. From this remaining
  population totaling $16.8 million in exemptions, we judgmentally selected
  58 exemptions valued at $2.9 million (17 percent of the audit population’s
  exemption dollar value) on properties with a total assessed value of $7.7
  million for our audit testing. We focused our sample selection on the
  58 higher dollar value exemptions as these have a greater financial tax
  impact on the remaining taxpayers within the Town. In some cases, certain
  properties were under more than one exemption category.
  ll We reviewed any available documentation relating to the exemptions and
  then recalculated the exemption amounts to verify that the property owners
  received the appropriate exemption amount.

We conducted this performance audit in accordance with GAGAS (generally
accepted government auditing standards). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.
We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.

  Of f ic e of t he New York State Comptroller  9