Southtowns Record

Case#1 - Finding and Decision

Government
Town of Wales
Kind
Other
Topics
Zoning and land use

Original document

Text · page 1 of 18

This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.

Case  \
  USE VARIANCE FINDINGS  OFFICE  USE  ONLY
  Application No. UV-_|~.202
  & DECISION  Date of Application:  JA  IIb las
  (Postmarked or Hand Deliveréd)
  Date of Public Hearing: BIS  IAL
  Applicant DAVid Sahauh = Twin wood Forest  Date Notice Published: :
  Date of County Referral:  ;
  LLG  Date of Final Action:  —
  Appeal Concerns Bred  at the following address:  Date of Filing of Decision with the
  Ca rpente C Koa  Municipal Clerk: 3 | 19 [QI,
  County Tax Map Section:  __ Block  Lot  __
  Zoning District Classifi ication:  \

  Use for which Variance is Requested:  ZO6,  2d  &  206  Ay

  Applicable Section of Zoning Code:  2OO»2S © 260,44
  Permitted Uses of Property:

  TEST: No use variance will be granted without a showing by the applicant that applicable
  zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. The following tests
  must be met for each and every use allowed by zoning on the property, including uses allowed
  by special use permit.
  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
  1.The Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, as shown by  FINANCIAL EVIDENCE
  competent financial evidence.  The lack of return must be  * Bill of sale for the
yz  SR substantial:  Yes___No>~  property, present value of
  property, expenses for
  iit
  Proof,__7\  ke  opp  co) LAN  Suuttoly  we) :  maintenance
  * Leases, rental
  ‘pa able Sa  Sanw  ew  | ospepnts  agreements
  ° Tax bills
  anad<  Mods f  dcoue  AW  oashiug  shod
  * Conversion costs (for a
  permitted use)
  ‘ae o\s  ye  ons  eoow  * Realtor’s statement of
  inability to rent/sell

  2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique. (The  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
  hardship may not apply to a substantial portion of the zoning district  UNIQUENESS
  or neighborhood.): Yes___ No_2—  * Topographic or physical
  features preventing
  development for a
  Proofs: The  AOD Wael  ess  Soe  Opswros  permitted use
  * Why would it be possible
  aeKoa  Wd  a2 Pan  Mek  a peak  WOe5
  to construct the applicant's
  proposal and not any of the
  Reo To)  hea  loaslowus  SOO  rouely,  permitted uses?
  ¢ Board member
  observations of the -
  property and surrounding
  area.