Text · page 13 of 18
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION _ | Sogcuosno
av =203 _
Date of Application:
appticant: David Sehau b ~Twinw
re
ood faarst Src
LLC , | Date Notice Published:
SU
2//
A IC
ppeal
Property at the foll
Concerns Property a e€ TO owing aaaress: Date of County Referral:
Cacpentec Road SBA#2Ip-00-1-30 Date of Final Action: —
County Tax Map Section: Block Lot Date of Filing of Decision with the
Zoning District Classification: . . Municipal Clerk: ATTEN
Requirement for which Variance is Requested:
Ma. Caan
-Wd
LO-
Applicable Section(s) of Zoning Code: “LCD « 3 Vee
TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the following
factors:
1. Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of neighborhood or a
detriment to nearby properties: Yes __No2<
Reasons: 2ZCh>o-\S Wey, LCOS -S2. Yes Us
2. Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible alternative to the
variance: Yes?*<_No___
Reasons:__[{Y\g ee \. eons SEN <\od§ VS A aang doo
3. Whether the requested variance is substantial: Yes = No2”
Reasons: 26-13 Wo 226 -S2_ Xess No
Tw +e out est A &i ina Velo tabio shad ~ SMa carsc eat
4. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in
the neighborhood: Yes___
No _=5_
Reasons: LAL A. Ay & Lnoset os nS N 2igbe o5
5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created: Yes 2SNo_
Reasons: Alo Ay Ss 4 \n2 osS$e