Southtowns Record

Case#2 - Finding and Decision

Government
Town of Wales
Kind
Other
Topics
Zoning and land use

Original document

Text · page 2 of 17

This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.

PAGE 2 OF 4:
  23. The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
a  neighborhood.: Yes Nox”
\\ RP;  a  ILLUSTRATIVE
  Proof: “Wo  wae  che  NO zis  wis  Weve  Sop C590)  NEIGHBORHOOD
  CHARACTER FACTORS
  a  \\o Ines Dw  Ht  he sheds  SS  ¢ Board members’
  observations of
  neighborhood.
  ¢ Expected effect of
  proposal on neighborhood,
  for example, change in
  parking patterns, noise
  levels, lighting, traffic.

  _4. The alleged hardship has been self-created. : Yes 2g No
ie Maye  SELF-CREATED
\\  Proof: The  Cp p\icws  OI  &S  Wok?  Ca  Dea fp > BY
  ¢ What were the
  SRR  UuaN\  wad  permitted uses at the
  Qjartdca  x  Sper  PSLRA,
  time the property was
  purchased by the
  \\~s-  0 poppy  9  applicant?
  * Were substantial sums
  spent on remodeling for a
  use not permitted by
  zoning?
  ¢ Was the property
  received through
  inheritance, court order,
  divorce?

  DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS:

  The ZBA, after reviewing the above four proofs, finds:

  ar That the applicant has failed to prove unnecessary hardship through the application of the
  four tests required by the state statutes.
  [] That the applicant has proven unnecessary hardship through the application of the four
  tests required by the state statutes. In finding such hardship, the ZBA shall grants a variance
  to allow use of the property in the manner detailed below, which is the minimum variance that
  should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the
  health, safety and welfare of the community:

  (USE)