Text · page 8 of 17
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
USE VARIANCE FINDINGS OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. UV- A7 207 & DECISION Date of Application: 1 (Postmarked or Hand Délivéred) Date of Public Hearing Applicant: bAVid Sahauh ~ Twin wood Forest Date Notice Published Date of County she: 3 _ LK Date of Final Action: Appeal Concerns Brod at the following address: C Date of Filing of Decision Ith the Carpenter Koa Municipal Clerk: 4 Lh Alp County Tax Map Section: Block Lot Zoning District Classification: Use for which Variance is Requested: Applicable Section of Zoning Code: Permitted Uses of Property: TEST: No use variance will be granted without a showing by the applicant that applicable zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. The following tests must be met for each and every use allowed by zoning on the property, including uses allowed by special use permit. ILLUSTRATIONS OF 1.The Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, as shown by FINANCIAL EVIDENCE competentfinancial evidence. The lack of return must be * Bill of sale for the substantial: Yes___ No X_ property, present value of property, expenses for Proot: THE PRorEReTy COM BE USED REASSNARCE maintenance * Leases, rental AS ~-15S. ANY FinanXone sues KAZE SELF agreements * Tax bills * Conversion costs (for a MADE permitted use) * Realtor's statement of inability to rent/sell 2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique. (The ILLUSTRATIONS OF hardship may not apply to a substantial portion of the zoning district UNIQUENESS or neighborhood.): Yes No * Topographic or physical features preventing BEWG USED AS LIVING development for a Proofs: No Main BulLoiwG, permitted use ¢ Why would it be possible Qu ALTERS to construct the applicant's proposal and not any of the permitted uses? * Board member observations of the - property and surrounding area.