Southtowns Record

Findings and Decision Sheet - Vallone (full text)

Town of Wales 16 pages

This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.

Page 1

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS co AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Applicant: Da ve U alloue OFFICE USE ONLY: Application No. AV-_lg- 2O2Z\|s Date of Application: 9 19 JAlp Appeal Concerns Property at the following address: (Postmarked or Hand! Delivered) Date of Public Hearing:_/O y Date Notice Published:_9j /AD/ Alu = AY NS p25 Yo eM Date of County Referral:_/ NO. Date of Final Action: Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal Clerk: lo g | alk - Section: County Tax Map (S.B.L.) \ ic Block: ©@© Lot, ¢- & =~ Zoning District Classification: L1O- | Fac lf Res. Requirements for which Variance is Requested: Daas Bucs A ressst so \b aok : “2 OCs = Pr a Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s): _ TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the following factors: 1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties: (Will this change make the neighborhood look or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or properties?) Yes No a Laie ly, KSOQW-2_ Woah AI FC RA tig Reason: oe b Ae KK. SSur2e 2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance. Page 1 of 4

Page 2

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION (Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?) Yes No 4 Lodo ean: . &\ wr) SiLe nN LL, Reason: Q» , Ans Ske pe \ OSNDae O Foe ple 4 ~~. cafes HS) OCD \py AN Colee, + costé 9 Gov rile Le 3) Whether the requested variance is substantial. (Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the zoning limits?) Yes No Po Reason: — Sethack 4S Lee hy AV WAS ARI ( rex oF ana etch 2 Gt \y A s\p> if 4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood? (Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?) Yes No 2s Reason: Loxo\c\K hy Sy eaat We |a ip AZ), 5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created? (Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not a result of something beyond the applicant's control.) Yes 2s No Page 2 of 4

Page 3

AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Reason: DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that: O the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied. UY the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community. AW ta NO We cc Reasons: L The ZBA further finds that a variance offen, ke 2_ from Section of the Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community because: CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons following: Condition No. 1: ro) 8 Page 3 of 4

Page 4

AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Adverse impact to be minimized: Condition No. 2: Ky | &) Adverse impact to be minimized: Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Se Dan) WWOWale Date: /° 7-26 eee OO eee Ue ree eee eee rere reer er rer eure creer err eer rrr er ree rr rer reer errr rec cee rer rere reer ere reer reece rrr rr errr ices reer rrr reer r ere errr rrr RECORD OF VOTE MEMBER NAME AYE NAY SIGNATURE 2BA Chair_ Go \O\haash < Cc Ja NEW 7BA Member (ia vit Gator * Mlb Jf ab m—as 7BA Member_@=Ss CLoWnce cs TY i 7BA Member“) «wo Cadw 2\\ oS ZBA Member Page 4 of 4

Page 5

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Nn, , 1 Applicant: “Jf /1 2 ¢ alte Uaecbps a Date of Application: Appeal concerns PropePOD, hee O yowing Mt address: (Postmarked or Hand Delivered) 474i’ Date Date Date of Public Hearing: Notice Published:___ of County Referral: Date of Final Action: Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal Clerk: County Tax Map (S.B.L.) - Section:__/ f | ka Block: Lot: & Zoning District Classification: 210 a Fam a Res Requirements for which Variance is Requested 2 VIC / LESS KT oy fern lb Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s): Cpe Apex Arsh 6-2 _ TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the following factors: 1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties: (Will this change make the neighborhood Iook or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or properties?) Yes No ke ( Reason: 2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance. \ Page 1 of 4

Page 6

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION (Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?) Yes No 4 Reason: 3) Whether the requested variance is substantial. (Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the zoning limits?) Yes No /[ v Reason: l 4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood? (Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?) Yes No VA i Reason: _ 5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created? (Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not a result of en the applicant's control.) Yes BS No Page 2 of 4

Page 7

EWU EW WE VFR EU IUEES LI PA WE OPI BPA AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Reason: DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that: [ the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied. i‘ the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community. Reasons: fs OF TEIMEY) a i co The ZBA further finds that a variance of_‘ Ly from section CL? of the Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community because: Pierred TA Romeitpy Ov Twe de ppg CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons following: Condition No. 1: Page 3 of 4

Page 8

We re Tr ee Re ee ee ed AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Adverse impact to be minimized: Condition No. 2: Adverse impact to be minimized: Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Date: Pee URS USSU SO SE CSU SC Seer S CCU Sree eer eres reser cece Pr reer errr sr recite teres cere rere cire rrr s ities rite reer ey DO emcees a ee meer ene Dees Ome bensueHonenet RECORD OF VOTE NAME AYE NAY MEMBER SIGNATURE dian ZBA Chair alt ZBA Member Jhnke CEM LY yl ZBA Member / i ZBA Member ZBA Member Page 4 of 4

Page 9

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION iii : Applicant:_.a v_€! : A Ve piGre /, Pi. +, USE ONLY: OFFICE Application No. AV- . Date of Application: Appeal Concerns Property at the following address: (Postmarked or Hand Detivered) , " i. fon Date of Public Hearing:____ i 3 2 % | aa £0 4n4 & & Date Notice Published:__ Date of County Referral: Date of Final Action: Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal Clerk: i bGee~ 1? G-G00 COREL TICCT- COO cae County Tax Map (S.B.L.) - Section: §7 4.¢© Block: Lot: Zoning District Classification: 2/10-_)} Fam, ly Kes “ab Requirements for which Variance is Requested: 26C a Areu Yen wry GA OS6 ALES Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s): 260 D2. TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the following factors: 1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties: (Will this change make the neighborhood look or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or properties?) Yes No_X i . { id A ig « : Reason. @C pis deol off rood ang bu-ldray gee ang - F df Sty le Lot a © € tt e 2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance. Page 10f 4

Page 10

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION (Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?) Yes No_ x Reason:__2u«. te Ex ish. “4 lene de ta r€) fa J fs ad ~ 3) Whether the requested variance is substantial. (Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the zoning limits?) Yes No_xX f . i i > mf $e. ~~ Reason:___ Zecalrvr i$ only Qq Fee rx pay een { je , ‘ i ‘ poe wi og the APY ah hows & Mat ee VY is geome a-j7arve € Armwoy * 7 4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood? (Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?) Yes No__ 2 Reason:__£-7 > fied ec? by wtA aren 5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created? (Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not a result of something beyond the applicant’s control.) Yes eX No Page 2 of 4

Page 11

IWVYVEN WE VWWAALEL 7 4S? BV V7 OA PA AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Reason: Ail Verda > are. DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that: O the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied. &] the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community. Reasons: Ni Detention a The ZBA further finds that a variance of__2e from Section__2 2 of the Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community because: App i ‘ wav? f iy act weegh B} aa ag! Be id al w/ te Ava aeee i CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons following: Condition No. 1: Page 3 of 4

Page 12

AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Adverse impact to be minimized: Condition No. 2: Adverse impact to be minimized: Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Date: RECORD OF VOTE MEMBER NAME AYE NAY SIGNATURE ZBA Chair ZBA Member_“ve-k Gs Thee ~ Lop! Liban ZBA Member ZBA Member ZBA Member Page 4 of 4

Page 13

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Russ ClerxigR, AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Applicant: DAVID VALLNE USE ONLY: OFFICE Application No. AV- . Date of Application: Appeal Concerns Property at the following address: (Postmarked or Hand Delivered) Date of Public Hearing: —_— Date Notice Published: Date of County Referral: Date of Final Action: Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal Clerk: County Tax Map (S.B.L.) - Section: Block: Lot: Zoning District Classification: A/O ~ ] Family Kes. Requirements for which Variance is Requested: Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s): TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the following factors: 1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties: (Will this change make the neighborhood look or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or properties?) Yes No xX Reason. FITS THE CHAR AtreR OF NEIGH Bee ywo 2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance. Page 1 of 4

Page 14

TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION (Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?) Yes No x~ Reason: Lor LAY evy Brno) Peno Do Ner PRoviWE OTYEL © €TWRS 3) Whether the requested variance is substantial. (Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the zoning limits?) Yes No x Reason, 27S oNit GNF co@rFe 4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood? (Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?) Yes No X Reason. AGAW it Fey 5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created? (Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not a result of something beyond the applicant’s control.) Yes Xx No Page 2 0f 4

Page 15

ENF VV ER UIE UPR RFT Be EBERT BP NFP UE PD Bee AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Reason: ALL Age SeLE C&FMtp DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that: O the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied. i the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood or Community. Reasons: THEETS MNiM4L Fo ZeEmo DEyRIMENT -v NEG Betyeco The ZBA further finds that a variance of from Section of the Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community because: CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons following: Condition No. 1: Page 3 of 4

Page 16

EWWWIN WE VVAALE? 7 BONEN? DWAR WT PA RPh AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION Adverse impact to be minimized: Condition No. 2: Adverse impact to be minimized: Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Date: RECORD OF VOTE MEMBER NAME AYE NAY SIGNATURE ZBA Chair 4 ZBA Member_KvSS_ CLoT mew x foul J? bee ZBA Member ZBA Member ZBA Member Page 40f 4

Back to the document