Findings and Decision Sheet - Vallone (full text)
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
Page 1
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
co AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Applicant: Da ve U alloue OFFICE
USE ONLY:
Application No. AV-_lg- 2O2Z\|s
Date of Application: 9 19 JAlp
Appeal Concerns Property at the following address: (Postmarked or Hand! Delivered)
Date of Public Hearing:_/O y
Date Notice Published:_9j /AD/ Alu
= AY NS p25 Yo eM Date of County Referral:_/ NO.
Date of Final Action:
Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal
Clerk: lo g | alk
- Section:
County Tax Map (S.B.L.) \ ic Block: ©@© Lot, ¢- &
=~ Zoning District Classification: L1O- | Fac lf Res.
Requirements for which Variance is Requested: Daas Bucs A ressst
so \b aok :
“2 OCs = Pr a
Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s):
_ TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the
following factors:
1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties:
(Will this change make the neighborhood look or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or
properties?)
Yes No a
Laie ly, KSOQW-2_ Woah AI FC RA tig
Reason:
oe b Ae KK. SSur2e
2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible
alternative to the variance.
Page 1 of 4
Page 2
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
(Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it
smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?)
Yes No 4
Lodo ean: . &\ wr) SiLe nN LL,
Reason:
Q» , Ans Ske pe \ OSNDae O Foe ple 4 ~~. cafes
HS) OCD \py AN Colee, + costé 9 Gov rile Le
3) Whether the requested variance is substantial.
(Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the
zoning limits?)
Yes No Po
Reason: — Sethack 4S Lee hy AV WAS ARI ( rex oF ana etch
2 Gt \y A s\p>
if
4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental
conditions in the neighborhood?
(Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions
in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?)
Yes No 2s
Reason: Loxo\c\K hy Sy eaat We
|a
ip AZ),
5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created?
(Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not
a result of something beyond the applicant's control.)
Yes 2s No
Page 2 of 4
Page 3
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Reason:
DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS:
The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that:
O the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the
Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied.
UY the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood
or Community.
AW ta NO We cc
Reasons: L
The ZBA further finds that a variance offen, ke 2_ from Section of the
Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve
and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare
of the community because:
CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to
minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons
following:
Condition No. 1: ro) 8
Page 3 of 4
Page 4
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Condition No. 2: Ky | &)
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Se Dan) WWOWale Date: /° 7-26
eee OO eee Ue ree eee eee rere reer er rer eure creer err eer rrr er ree rr rer reer errr rec cee rer rere reer ere reer reece rrr rr errr ices reer rrr reer r ere errr rrr
RECORD OF VOTE
MEMBER NAME AYE NAY SIGNATURE
2BA Chair_ Go \O\haash < Cc Ja NEW
7BA Member (ia vit Gator * Mlb Jf ab m—as
7BA Member_@=Ss CLoWnce cs TY i
7BA Member“) «wo Cadw 2\\ oS
ZBA Member
Page 4 of 4
Page 5
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Nn, , 1
Applicant: “Jf /1 2 ¢ alte Uaecbps a
Date of Application:
Appeal concerns PropePOD, hee O yowing
Mt address: (Postmarked or Hand Delivered)
474i’ Date
Date
Date
of Public Hearing:
Notice Published:___
of County Referral:
Date of Final Action:
Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal
Clerk:
County Tax Map (S.B.L.) - Section:__/ f | ka Block: Lot: &
Zoning District Classification: 210 a Fam a Res
Requirements for which Variance is Requested 2 VIC / LESS KT oy fern lb
Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s): Cpe Apex Arsh 6-2
_ TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the
following factors:
1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties:
(Will this change make the neighborhood Iook or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or
properties?)
Yes No ke
(
Reason:
2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible
alternative to the variance.
\
Page 1 of 4
Page 6
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
(Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it
smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?)
Yes No 4
Reason:
3) Whether the requested variance is substantial.
(Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the
zoning limits?)
Yes No
/[ v
Reason:
l
4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental
conditions in the neighborhood?
(Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions
in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?)
Yes No VA
i
Reason: _
5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created?
(Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not
a result of en the applicant's control.)
Yes BS No
Page 2 of 4
Page 7
EWU EW WE VFR EU IUEES LI PA WE OPI BPA
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Reason:
DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS:
The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that:
[ the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the
Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied.
i‘ the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood
or Community.
Reasons: fs OF TEIMEY) a
i co
The ZBA further finds that a variance of_‘ Ly from section CL? of the
Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve
and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare
of the community because:
Pierred TA Romeitpy Ov Twe de ppg
CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to
minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons
following:
Condition No. 1:
Page 3 of 4
Page 8
We re Tr ee Re ee ee ed
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Condition No. 2:
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Date:
Pee URS USSU SO SE CSU SC Seer S CCU Sree eer eres reser cece Pr reer errr sr recite teres cere rere cire rrr s ities rite reer ey DO emcees a ee meer ene Dees Ome bensueHonenet
RECORD OF VOTE
NAME AYE NAY
MEMBER SIGNATURE
dian
ZBA Chair alt
ZBA Member Jhnke CEM LY yl
ZBA Member / i
ZBA Member
ZBA Member
Page 4 of 4
Page 9
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
iii :
Applicant:_.a v_€!
: A
Ve piGre
/, Pi. +,
USE ONLY:
OFFICE
Application No. AV-
. Date of Application:
Appeal Concerns Property at the following address: (Postmarked or Hand Detivered)
, " i. fon Date of Public Hearing:____
i 3 2 % | aa £0 4n4 & & Date Notice Published:__
Date of County Referral:
Date of Final Action:
Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal
Clerk:
i bGee~ 1? G-G00 COREL TICCT- COO
cae
County Tax Map (S.B.L.) - Section: §7 4.¢© Block: Lot:
Zoning District Classification: 2/10-_)} Fam, ly Kes
“ab
Requirements for which Variance is Requested: 26C a Areu Yen wry GA OS6
ALES
Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s): 260 D2.
TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the
following factors:
1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties:
(Will this change make the neighborhood look or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or
properties?)
Yes No_X
i . { id A ig « :
Reason. @C pis deol off rood ang bu-ldray gee ang
- F df
Sty le Lot a © € tt e
2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible
alternative to the variance.
Page 10f 4
Page 10
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
(Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it
smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?)
Yes No_ x
Reason:__2u«. te Ex ish. “4 lene de ta r€) fa J
fs ad ~
3) Whether the requested variance is substantial.
(Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the
zoning limits?)
Yes No_xX
f . i i > mf $e. ~~
Reason:___ Zecalrvr i$ only Qq Fee rx pay een
{ je , ‘ i ‘ poe wi
og the APY ah hows & Mat ee VY is geome a-j7arve €
Armwoy *
7
4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental
conditions in the neighborhood?
(Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions
in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?)
Yes No__ 2
Reason:__£-7 > fied ec? by wtA aren
5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created?
(Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not
a result of something beyond the applicant’s control.)
Yes eX No
Page 2 of 4
Page 11
IWVYVEN WE VWWAALEL 7 4S? BV V7 OA PA
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Reason: Ail Verda > are.
DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS:
The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that:
O the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the
Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied.
&] the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood
or Community.
Reasons: Ni Detention a
The ZBA further finds that a variance of__2e from Section__2 2 of the
Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve
and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare
of the community because:
App i ‘ wav? f iy act weegh B} aa ag!
Be id al w/ te
Ava aeee
i
CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to
minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons
following:
Condition No. 1:
Page 3 of 4
Page 12
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Condition No. 2:
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Date:
RECORD OF VOTE
MEMBER NAME AYE NAY SIGNATURE
ZBA Chair
ZBA Member_“ve-k Gs Thee ~ Lop! Liban
ZBA Member
ZBA Member
ZBA Member
Page 4 of 4
Page 13
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Russ ClerxigR,
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Applicant: DAVID VALLNE USE ONLY:
OFFICE
Application No. AV-
. Date of Application:
Appeal Concerns Property at the following address: (Postmarked or Hand Delivered)
Date of Public Hearing: —_—
Date Notice Published:
Date of County Referral:
Date of Final Action:
Date or Filing of Decision with the Municipal
Clerk:
County Tax Map (S.B.L.) - Section: Block: Lot:
Zoning District Classification: A/O ~ ] Family Kes.
Requirements for which Variance is Requested:
Applicable Section of Zoning Code(s):
TEST: No area variance will be granted without a consideration by the board of the
following factors:
1) Whether undesirable change would be produced in character of
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties:
(Will this change make the neighborhood look or feel worse, or hurt nearby homes or
properties?)
Yes No xX
Reason. FITS THE CHAR AtreR OF NEIGH Bee ywo
2) Whether benefit sought by applicant can be achieved by a feasible
alternative to the variance.
Page 1 of 4
Page 14
TOWN OF WALES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
(Is there a realistic alternative (like changing the design, moving the building, making it
smaller, or using a different layout) that would follow the current code?)
Yes No x~
Reason: Lor LAY evy Brno) Peno Do Ner PRoviWE
OTYEL © €TWRS
3) Whether the requested variance is substantial.
(Is the change the applicant is asking for significant? How far are you trying to bend the
zoning limits?)
Yes No x
Reason, 27S oNit GNF co@rFe
4) Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental
conditions in the neighborhood?
(Will this change negatively impact the environment or damage the physical conditions
in the area...such as traffic, drainage, noise, air, or natural features?)
Yes No X
Reason. AGAW it Fey
5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created?
(Did the applicant cause the issue? The issue is a result of action(s) by the applicant, not
a result of something beyond the applicant’s control.)
Yes Xx No
Page 2 0f 4
Page 15
ENF
VV ER UIE UPR RFT Be EBERT BP NFP UE PD Bee
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Reason: ALL Age SeLE C&FMtp
DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS:
The ZBA, after taking into consideration the above five factors, finds that:
O the Benefit to the Applicant DOES NOT Outweigh the Detriment to the
Neighborhood or Community and therefore the variance request is denied.
i the Benefit to the Applicant DOES outweigh the Detriment to the Neighborhood
or Community.
Reasons: THEETS MNiM4L Fo ZeEmo DEyRIMENT -v
NEG Betyeco
The ZBA further finds that a variance of from Section of the
Zoning Code is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve
and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare
of the community because:
CONDITIONS: The ZBA finds that the following conditions are necessary in order to
minimize adverse impacts upon the neighborhood or community, for the reasons
following:
Condition No. 1:
Page 3 of 4
Page 16
EWWWIN WE VVAALE? 7 BONEN? DWAR WT PA RPh
AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS & DECISION
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Condition No. 2:
Adverse impact to be minimized:
Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman: Date:
RECORD OF VOTE
MEMBER NAME AYE NAY SIGNATURE
ZBA Chair 4
ZBA Member_KvSS_ CLoT mew x foul J? bee
ZBA Member
ZBA Member
ZBA Member
Page 40f 4