Text · page 3 of 5
Page 47 April 28, 2026 6. Decommissioning bond must be submitted to the Town Board and Town Attorney for approval prior to issuance of the Building Permit. 7. Decommissioning bond must be obtained for Project with a minimum value of $517,500. The Decommissioning bond is to be reviewed and renewed every five years. Any change in Project owner or operator must be reflected in the documentation for the decommissioning bond. 8. If the owner or operator of the Project changes, the successor owner or operator shall notify the Town Code Enforcement Officer of such change in ownership or operator within 30 days of the change and shall provide updated contact information in providing such notice. 9. The Project shall comply with the requirements of the current Town of Concord Solar Energy Systems local law contained in Chapter 150, Article XXXIX of the Town Code, also being Town of Concord Local Law Number 1 of 2021. Supervisor Drozd asked Town Engineer Caleb Henning if he had anything add, and he said that it has been a lot of work getting to this point, and he is available to answer any questions that the Board may have. Mr. Henning also wanted to point out that the project has been reduced in size-during the environmental review there was no reduction to the size of the project. After the review was completed, the applicant submitted a revised application which showed a significant reduction in the acreage affected by the project. It was a little over ten acres difference. Supervisor Drozd wanted to make a personal statement prior to the Board vote: “My personal view on this probably could be summed up by the movie The Witches of Eastwick from 1987, when Cher and Jack Nicolson had words. Direct and honest as possible. That is how I feel about this project. I personally am not in favor of this project. The sad thing is that I have an obligation to uphold the laws of New York State, however crazy they may be. The problem is not with local officials of any municipality. It is at the top. We have officials in Albany spewing unrealistic goals, if you will. Change will only come when common sense is restored at the top. There are some areas right now in Eric County that have projects going up that I do agree with. There is a project of battery energy storage at Tonawanda Coke. Everybody knows what is underneath that ground at Tonawanda Coke. It is worthless, vacant land-there is garbage in there and all kinds arsenic in there. That is where these projects should be. There is another spot between two train tracks in the Tonawanda area. It is land that nobody will ever buy and nobody will ever build on, and nobody would ever see it. That is where it belongs. There is another one over in Genesee County, just past GCC on the Thruway. It is right next to the Thruway. Nobody can see it and it doesn’t hurt anybody. It is under usable, undesirable land that is worthless-that is where these arrays belong in my personal opinion, and shame on Erie County Environment and Planning for not taking a harder stance on farmland. Again, we have to uphold laws that anyone with common sense would consider garbage, and again this application came in before our moratorium. A new, tighter law is coming.” Council Member Drake made the following statement: “I would just like to say that in 2017 this Town did not have a solar law, and I co- authored the first law, along with Wendel’s, which is a highly respected engineering firm, and believe it or not New York State. At that point they were pretty much against it. We were warned at the time not to make the law too restrictive where if it went to court the whole law would get thrown out. So, we did the first law based on the situation that was going on then. When I was Supervisor, we tightened that law up twice, as far as setbacks and things like that. But this has been a moving target, and unfortunately, we have other things that were going on and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. These people have satisfied what the law requires. Again, we take an oath to uphold the laws and the code of the Town, and to do otherwise would be violating our oath. Council Member Krzemien added her statement: “I would just like to say that this project has been a tremendous amount of time and effort, from the Town Supervisor, my colleagues on the Board, our Town Clerk, Brian