Southtowns Record

Village Board minutes — May 18, 2026

Government
Village of East Aurora
Board
Village Board
Meeting
May 18, 2026
Kind
Minutes
Topics
Zoning and land use, Public safety, Budget and taxes, Water, sewer and drainage, Moratoriums, Roads and traffic, Parks and recreation

Original document

Same meeting

Text · page 2 of 12

the project, voted in the majority recommending approval, with findings; and
  WHEREAS, the Village SEQRA Intake Committee carefully and fully reviewed Part 1 of
  the SEAF submitted by applicants, including the Site Plan attached thereto, and the
  above-referenced amendments and modifications; and
  WHEREAS, the Village SEQRA Intake Committee, after their review of the above,
  prepared Parts 2 and 3 of the SEAF with a recommendation of the issuance of the
  Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for submission to, and consideration
  by, the Village Board; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees, upon taking an independent hard look and
  reasoned evaluation of the above-referenced information, comments and written
  documentation, including, but not limited to, Part 1 of the SEAF; comments,
  recommendations, findings and conditions of the Planning Commission, the Site Plan and
  the recommendation of the SEQRA Intake Committee and that Committee’s completed
  Parts 2 and 3 of the SEAF concerning the potential environmental impacts of the project;
  all of which are incorporated by reference herein; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board, upon carefully and fully reviewing all the information,
  comments, and written documentation in regard to the project, made a finding that there
  are no significant environmental impacts.
  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village Board of East Aurora as Lead
  Agency has determined that the proposed action described in the SEAF, submitted by the
  applicants, for the site plan proposed to replace the existing parking lot lighting with new
  quad, dark sky-compliant LED fixtures at 123 Grey Street, as detailed in the Site Plan
  Application dated February 24, 2026, is classified as an Type II Action and therefore
  issues a Negative Declaration, that this development will not have a significant
  environmental impact and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be required
  nor prepared.
o Resolution of the Village Board of East Aurora Approving the Site Plan for 123 Grey
  Street, applicant Benderson Development, to replace the existing parking lot lighting with
  new quad, dark sky-compliant LED fixtures.
  WHEREAS, an application has been submitted for Site Plan Approval at the above-
  referenced property by applicant Benderson Development, represented by: James
  Boglioli,
  WHEREAS, the Village Board referred the site plan to the Planning Commission for
  review, comment and recommendation, and the Planning Commission resolution,
  recommending site plan approval, with findings and no conditions; and
  WHEREAS, the Village’s SEQRA Intake Committee considered the application and
  reviewed Part 1 of the Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by the applicant
  and completed Part 2 and Part 3 thereof on behalf of the Village, and it was the
  recommendation of the SEQRA Committee and approved by the Village Board as a
  Negative Declaration, including that the proposed development plan is a Type II Action
  and would have no significant environmental impact; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board at a public meeting reviewed and considered further the
  comments and all written materials submitted by the applicant and all other information
  and recommendations before the Board, including minutes of prior Village Board
  meetings and the recommendations from the SEQRA Intake Committee and Planning
  Commission, and the referral and response from the Erie County Division of Planning
  declaring: No Recommendation; proposed action has been reviewed and determined to be
  of local concern; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board received and considered the Site Plan, the above-
  referenced upgrades, and any and all amendments thereof; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board has separately considered the environmental impacts of
  the project, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration of