ZBA Packet 4.22.26 (full text)

WEST SENECA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1300 Union Road, West Seneca, NY 14224 6:00 PM in the Community Center April 22, 2026 AGENDA Meeting # 2026-04 CALL TO ORDER OPENING OF PUBLIC HEARING APPROVAL OF PROOFS OF PUBLICATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting #2026-03 OLD BUSINESS 2025-047 Request of Anthony Nieves Garcia for property located at 137 Fernald Avenue to allow construction of a fence 4’ in height in the front yard with a 25’ projection (maximum projection 10’ allowed). NEW BUSINESS 2026-014 Request of Joshua Haueise for property located at 77 Marlin Drive to allow for 18" setback for a driveway/ walkway extension. (3' set back is required). 2026-006 Request of Andrew Olivieri for property located at 25 Deerpath to allow construction of a 6' high fence in front/side yard (maximum height in front/side yard is 4' and rear yard 6'). 2026-007 Request of Holly O'connell for the property located at 59 North Covington Drive to allow for a 44" setback to lot line for installation of a generator (5' setback required). 2026-008 Request of Michael Wiley for property located at 104 Norwood Drive to allow construction of a 6' fence in front/ side yard (maximum height in front/side yard 4' and rear yard 6') 2026-009 Request of Michael Berger with Sutton Architecture for property located at 1976 Ridge Page 1 of 68

Road to allow for 26 parking spaces for a proposed nail salon (66 parking spots required). 2026-010 Request of Joy Kent for property located at 14 Sunrise Terrace to allow for 4' setback to lot line for generator installation (5' setback required) 2026-011 Request of Jeremy Kamholz for property located at 2 Vista Court for an 8.5' separation from patio roof to pool (10' separation required) 2026-012 Request of Richard Radwan for the property located at 76 Sunnyside Drive for a variance to allow a 10.5 front setback for a pool (30' front setback required) 2026-013 Request of Kristina Lighten for property located at 2 Cheryl Road to allow for construction of a 6' high fence in front/side yard (maximum height in front/side yard 4' and rear yard 6'). ADJOURN Future meetings are held the fourth Wednesday of the month at 6:00 pm Page 2 of 68

WEST SENECA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1300 Union Road, West Seneca, NY 14224 6:00 PM in the Community Center March 25, 2026 AGENDA Meeting # 2026-03 CALL TO ORDER Present: Zoning Board Member Joette Tronolone Zoning Board Member Amelia Greenan Zoning Board Member Paul Lang Chairperson Stephen Stachowski ZBA Counsel Joseph Trapp Code Enforcement Representative Doug Busse Town Board Liaison Jeffery Piekarec Absent: Zoning Board Member Edmund Bedient absent at roll call but was present for majority of the meeting. He was a few minutes late and is excused for the tardiness. OPENING OF PUBLIC HEARING Motion by Tronolone, seconded by Lang, to open Public Hearing. Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 Motion Carried APPROVAL OF PROOFS OF PUBLICATION Motion by Greenan, seconded by Lang, to approve Proofs of Publication. Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 Motion Carried APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting #2026-01 & #2026-02 Motion by Stachowski, seconded by Tronolone to approve ZBA January 28, 2026, and February 25, 2026, meeting minutes. Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 Motion Carried OLD BUSINESS 2024-043 Request of Dave Sutton of Sutton Architecture for property located at 555 Orchard Park Road for a variance to allow live music on the property (live music not permitted). Page 3 of 68

Dave Sutton of Sutton Architecture, owner of the property and partner at The Ridge, presented an application to continue offering live music. The business has successfully offered live music for the past six to twelve months without any known complaints. The applicant requested a use variance to allow live music from 6:00 PM to 11:00 PM, Monday through Sunday, for both indoor and outdoor spaces. The music is primarily indoors, with limited, smaller-scale music on the outdoor patio. Live music is considered a necessity for the business, contributing to a documented 20% increase in income on evenings when it is offered. Board Member Greenan questioned the applicant about this documentation, which had not been formally submitted. The property is in a commercial area with no residential aspect, and there have been no noise complaints. Code enforcement Busse noted the local noise ordinance does not change between 10:00 PM and 11:00 PM. The board approved the use variance for live music from 6:00 PM to 11:00 PM for a period of one year. The motion passed. Discussion on Financial Documentation and Future Regulations ZBA Counsel Trapp advised that requesting financial information is common for a use variance and can be kept confidential. The board decided that while no formal documentation was needed for this meeting, an affidavit would be appropriate for future requests. It was discussed that the town is in the process of changing the regulations for live music, potentially reclassifying it as a special use permit instead of a use variance, which has a stricter financial hardship requirement. This new local law is in the early stages. Use Variance: Stachowski: given the nature of the business. 1 Can a reasonable return be achieved by another method? It seems necessary to have the ability to produce live music in order to have a viable business and to use the building in a viable way. 2 Is this a unique circumstance? Running a business with the cost of goods and labor in 2026 is a difficult endeavor, therefore having live music presents a necessity to overcome the uniqueness of a restaurant business. 3 Does the variance change the character of the neighborhood? It’s mostly all commercial around that property, there is not really a residential aspect to that area where the business exists, so grants this will not affect the essential character of the neighborhood. 4 Is this a self-created hardship? No, it’s not self-created, the restaurant is a difficult business, and live music can ensure a viable return. Motion by Stachowski, seconded by Greenan, to approve live music on property. Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 Motion Carried 2025-047 Request of Anthony Nieves Garcia for property located at 137 Fernald Avenue to allow construction of a fence 4’ in height in the front yard with a 25’ projection (maximum projection 10’ allowed). The applicant for case 2025-47 requested their item be tabled until the April meeting. Page 4 of 68

The applicant is still in conversation with their contractor regarding the board's request for other fence options. The board approved the motion to table this application until the April meeting. Motion by Tronolone, seconded by Greenan, to table fence variance. Ayes: 4 Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 Motion Carried NEW BUSINESS Chairperson Stachowski announced member Ed Biedent now present for the record. 6:18pm 2026-003 Request of Brianne Zhang for property located at 2806 Seneca Street for a variance 120- 29(a) requesting 18 dwelling units (5 dwelling units permitted) and 120-41 (d)(1) requesting 31 parking spaces (41 spaces required). Brianne Zhang presented a project to convert a 30,000 sq. ft. dormant landmark building into 18 residential units, primarily studio and one-bedroom apartments. The building's exterior footprint will not be altered, except for a new elevator tower. A density variance was required as the code allows only 5 units. The applicant argued developing only 5 units would be economically unfeasible. Chairperson Stachowski asked Code Enforcement what their position is on the 18 dwelling units. Code Enforcement Busse responded they do not have a position on it, being an existing structure it’s a unique situation to utilize the entirety of the building, stating all the units exceed the minimum square footage requirement for town code. Chairperson Stachowski inquired about neighbor letters, and county and state comment. Code Enforcement Busse said all board members have been provided with all the comments from NYS DOT, Erie County DOT and DOE planning. The neighbor letters were not required/ necessary. This matter has already been in front of the planning board along with other path of approval and didn’t fall in the 250’ requirement. Greenan AREA Variance balancing test 1 change to the neighborhood, no there is no exterior changes to this existing building it will be adaptive reuse of the vacant building. 2 is there an alternative? The applicant pointed out that the number of units is critical to this project. Five units would be physically and economically unworkable. 3 is the request substantial? This might be considered a substantial increase but seems necessary for the layout of the building. 4 Does the variance have an impact on the environment? We have no reason to believe there would be. 5 is this a self-created difficulty? Not a self-created hardship, in this case it’s a reasonable adaptive reuse project. Motion by Greenan, seconded by Lang, to approve 18 Dwelling units. Page 5 of 68

Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion Carried A parking variance was also required, proposing 31 spaces instead of the required 41. The applicant argued that full compliance would require partial demolition of the historic building. They cited data showing lower car usage for studio/one-bedroom units in transit- oriented locations, noting the property is near an NFTA park-and-ride and a bus route. Conclusion Greenan AREA/USE Variance test 1 can a reasonable return be achieved? Thirty-one parking spaces seem reasonable and the NFT lot was cited as overflow. 2 is there an alternative method? The only way for full compliance is demotion, which defeats the purpose of the project. 3 Is it substantial? It’s proportionate for this unit mix. 4 is there an environmental impact? The fewer parking spaces reduces stormwater benefit. 5 is this a self-created difficulty? No, it’s a fixed location and pre-existing. Motion by Greenan, seconded by Lang, to approve 31 parking spaces. Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion Carried 2026-004 Request of Richard Eppolito for property located at 247 Elmsford Drive to allow for installation of a standby generator in front yard 23.06’ from property line (minimum front yard installation 30.0') Variance Request for a Standby Generator at 247 Elmsford The property owner, Richard Eppolito, requested a variance to install a standby generator 7 feet from a property line, where a 30-foot setback is required for the corner lot. Alternative locations were not feasible, and the applicant provided signatures from six adjacent neighbors who had no objections. Tronolone AREA variance balancing 1 is there an undesirable change to the neighborhood? No proposed generator is a typical residential accessory structure.2 is there an alternative? No, due to site constraints, including a covered patio and adjacent outdoor grill and entertaining living space. 3 is the request substantial? No, the structure is small in scale and low in height. 4 does the variance have an impact on the environment? It will comply with all applicable building and safety codes including noise and emission standards. 5 is this a self-created difficulty? The difficult can be considered self-created, as it arises from the applicant’s desire to install a generator, however this is not the determining factor of granting the variance. Motion by Tronolone, seconded by Lang, to approve installation of standby generator. Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion Carried Page 6 of 68

2026-005 Request of Susan Burton for property located at 41 Iris Ave to allow construction of a fence 6' in side yard (maximum height in side yard 4' allowed) Variance Request for a 6-Foot Fence at 41 Iris Avenue The applicant, Susan Burton, requested a variance to build a 6-foot fence in the side yard to connect with her neighbor's existing 6-foot fence, where code allows a maximum of 4 feet. The new fence will match the neighbor's height and will be less restrictive to the neighboring driveway than the old fence. The applicant provided signatures from supportive neighbors. Lang AREA variance 1 is there an undesirable change to the neighborhood? No, fencing is more likely improving the neighborhood. 2 Is there an alternative? No, a compliant fence height would not provide the same level of privacy for the backyard and would be rendered a less desirable aesthetic. 3 is the request substantial? No, the increase is minor. 4 does the variance have an impact on the environment? No, it will not impact drainage or the environment. 5 is this a self-created difficulty? Yes, to a degree. However, it’s not a determining factor. Motion by Lang, seconded by Greenan, to approve construction of 6’ fence. Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion Carried ADJOURN Future meetings are held the fourth Wednesday of the month at 6:00 pm Page 7 of 68

Page 8 of 68

Page 9 of 68

Page 10 of 68

Page 11 of 68

Page 12 of 68

Page 13 of 68

Page 14 of 68

Page 15 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEA Tel. No. Appeal No. 2026-014 Date 3/ I lo\ 2-02.J.p TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: I (we)){ \ Tosh1Ac\, l-hu e j 51' of ·7 ·1 Mchd ,·') 0 r. J \ es::r S·< o r,.a- ) NY I 422 L/ , HEREBY APPEAL To THE zoNrNG BoARD oF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO:---------------------------- 0 A PERMIT FOR USE 0 A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE 0 A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 0 A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE □ A TEMPORARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF � AREA PERMIT 1. Applicant is the .fD.PROPERTY OWNER [] CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN 0 PROSPECTIV E TENANT 0 OTHER (Describe)------,,---r-r--:c------ ----..--------------- 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY :r=+ M�,� D� ��1.,-.J 3. State in general the exact nature o_f the%.mission required,-'0(24 ,,-- --'-.,,-\J_r_' �--1------'---'-------------- c\cS:.� ±b� �B f\�!V\ SO\£,- � Hr4lL- 4. PREV IOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect � to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No. , dated---------------- , 2Q ___ . 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A. A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not change the character of the district because:------- B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:______________________ C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article____ Section---, Subsection---, Paragraph ___ of the Zoning Ordinance, because; _______________ Applicant's Signature TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR I. Provision s) of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance l2°·-37'l -� ,.. <�n , a-77:- 2. Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appeal--f=-t----:_j__,__________________ 3. Ty of Appeal: � Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal.---------------- Building Insp�+}\ _,,__________________ Page 16 of 68

Page 17 of 68

Page 18 of 68

Page 19 of 68

Page 20 of 68

Page 21 of 68

Page 22 of 68

Page 23 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: I (we) A {\nidnf·Cw 0\ \,'.'I ,e ,�, 0� ZS De E.\2..., �i.A-l_ \J-..l Cs T �>'C..Yl�C,<.\ bJ -l/ \,A.,> \.J o r \<...__ , HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: ____________________________ 10� -,Ji A PERMIT FOR USE A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY A TEMPO_RARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF � O A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE O A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AREA PERMIT _ - •• I. Apphcant 1s the>Q PROPERTY OWNER 0 CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN 0 PROSPECTIVE TENANT 0 OTHER (Describe)---------------------------- 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY X 25 ·oe.e \<- <A;1t-\- . 3. State in general the exact nature of the permission required, Cv +oo ·\-· Q-<..v-.C� � '-- ·· '"\ �- < 0 't.. '-fC- ro ) l ,,, _u ' ':::t \JV':&.:.)(: � '"<, ._,......, 'T°""'-d:. 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No.---, dated----------------, 2Q ___ 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A. A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the, ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: ------- � :Q-.(. • ::i!,.:------CJ O.l€cl . B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:---�-------------------- R 6t.1.\..,...id- C-c.'-'"'-<'.·""· <. 4 f=� t J --:-:> ... -:-""""' � .,_cf r. n '""'.\- -t .c � cL ,,,_,of C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article ____ Section l?.(l , Subsection 39 , Paragraph____g_of the Zoning Ordinance, because:-______________ _,.__ Applicant's Signature TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 1. Provision(s)of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance ToW\. Lo'""'-� ..... O-.r-d.,--"..._,.,t'___ ] \2.. 6··1.'-t is 2. Zoning Classification· of the property concerned in this appeal __ i.'·_-_·7_· ,._ _r ________________ 3. Type of Appeal: ( □ � Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. 0 Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. ---------------- Building Inspector---��'---"".,,,..--��·fu,�_£ ______________ _ Page 24 of 68

Page 25 of 68

Page 26 of 68

Page 27 of 68

Page 28 of 68

Page 29 of 68

Page 30 of 68

Page 31 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS Tel. NoX - Appeal No.----- --- /Jo[){p otR Date )( !J\zq_,I? (a TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: 1 (we) y; db\ I O 'Conned I It of x 50:i l\bclJ.oCavi�ioYJl>C S\JftrU:1_1\K.P ------------ - - - -- , HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THJ lf@ 44 ("";f.(;. F<:o��..,.¼ \ (\A. DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING �) '"-V'- � , .,._-\--., r 11 INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: "'. '-'- 'S.-\-'?\\ \ ""-- -L' □ A PERMIT FOR USE □ A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE □ A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY □ A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE □ A TEMPORARY�RMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF AREA PERMIT ;a:- 1. Applicant is the.,;tS- PROPERTY OWNER □ CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN □ PROSPECTIVE TENANT □ OTHER (Describe)---------------------------- 2. LocAnoN oF THE PROPERTY¼ 51 l\bdb C.Ovi'cS™::lAr:�re ::lxffo..\6 � \½ZZC) 3. State in general the exact nature of the permission required,----------------------- 4. PREV IOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No.___ , dated------ - -- - - - - - , 2Q___ 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A. A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not change the character of the district because:------- � S,. ,Q__-12- �"'"'-- c,\_() (<l cf. B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: __(:,_·R.�. ....,,.-�_,_.,__:\-.._�_J __ ...--'---.:!...=-..cv-. ---"--"" ....__c..,.:-=-v---. _ _ __ s ��-<---+-- :-\-,v_ ___· v-,- ;:- .___ ;;- v�...,. -. <9 -� <9 <{:{; f>�D'?•·-' [\--'--I \ � - ,._ � . C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article____ Section fbV , Subsection-� .cl , Paragraph---of the Zoning Ordinarice, because:______________ TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 1. Provision(s) of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance :re (.,,,.,s �-----S- ......) C9 ('J.�t..,.,., ✓ 1·20 -·s "'? 2. Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appeal __ :2,�_-_,_\ _ _ _____ ______ _ 3. Type of Appeal: ,Pn- Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. D Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. ------------- - - Building Inspector � Page 32 of 68

Page 33 of 68

Page 34 of 68

Page 35 of 68

Page 36 of 68

Page 37 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS ><Tel.No. Appeal No. 2D2lo-W'2; Date 3 / 2�- / 2 � TO THE S, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: :>< l (we)-1-1,1.CLL:..::::....L.'---'::....!e:'..---'"""""'--'--'-=-�----------- of___ S.._"_.,_A--'--'"-�C-" ..:.......C ,__-:r__________ , HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO:---------------------------- □ A PERMIT FOR USE □ A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE □ A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY □ A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE □ A TEMPORARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF � AREA PERMIT 1. Applicant is th� PROPERTY OWNER □ CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN □ PROSPECTIVE TENANT □ OTHER (Describe) «)tfll!J;c :.zi-. -y 7f ?( 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY /f2t./ tfvtyr' t14,,,5f �C:c�//..Jlf 3. State in general the exact nature of the permission required, ___________________./,__,.f'.�U -�- 7'1�- '--, 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No.---, dated -----------------, 20 ___ 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A. A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the vari nee would observe the spirit of the ordinm ce and would not change the character of the district because:------- =� B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:---�------------------- C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article ____ Section---, Subsection---, Paragraph ___ of the Zoning Ordinance, because; ._--------------- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 1. Provision(s) of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance /Z O - 3 'l /81 &, ,.,_, sAwl I au 1 ;;,-,..,d.,,,( (,.,' t ;,. h,.;ty,J .,, s;:,{� I 2. �, . ,�- Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appeal---�"'-=-- -"- "-------------------- .., 3. Ty�of Appeal: .-esJ Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. D Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. ---------------- B Building lnspectoc::;:::>_c7c.,p,,, --=- ·- ....·--------------- Page 38 of 68

Page 39 of 68

Page 40 of 68

Page 41 of 68

Page 42 of 68

Page 43 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS Tel. No. Appeal No. d-.b?.. Co .- 6 a9 10 THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: Date ;;;/?. \lJ /�� I(we) MiCJl\ aj �n;ef of �+\-on Ar-d,�.lulw..e.... ______--=...,�---------, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUfLDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUJLDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: '24d,u �e,_ 94-c:� (4 2', :&u:o:,,n U (_tt4ue,,J.. 'fO � c,e +:t? vie;,.r.'ow1e�) 0 A PERMIT FOR USE O A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE 0 A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ·--II A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE 0 A TEMPORARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF AAREA• PERMIT 1. Applicant is the ·C PROPERTY OWNER D{ CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN �- PROSPECTIVE TENANT LJ OTHER (Describe)--------------------------- l 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY--......':l�'1-"�-1Z�:d�i-e-�?._tJ�a / .........____________ . . . PREVIOUS A PEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No.---, dated _______________ , 20--- 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A A Vaiiance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship c·reated is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: _"'....,fb..?cu;;.____ s.s ) ..\...e..,,Js 1:,i;5tn -e o oat i_L417A2,n� h, i d.. w� ll � re,.\., A cro f 01. r'1 Ak\.e. :h ec�k-.t.\ ?�le.��- to WDck w ttl t�< PcoposeJ �) 1 B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested beca�se: ?rn(.,ler-h-t o\o�s rurf \.,i 4ve 41,..€., ___fftJu�reJi �ce to P@v.�d.e {f Ct) S{Je..us • C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Artic:le�-- Section ___ , Subsection---, Paragraph--of tho Zooing O,d;nance, because: .J./1 . � . TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 1. Provision(s) pf the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance 2. Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appea] ___C�Z-:�---------------- 3. T�f Appeal: � Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. 0 Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Pennit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. --------------- Building Inspector 0� ... -< Page 44 of 68

Page 45 of 68

Page 46 of 68

Page 47 of 68

Page 48 of 68

Page 49 of 68

Page 50 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS rATel. No "' Appeal No.. �\J� (c - Q\ (.) Date 3/ �(o/;J� TO THE z ALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: 0 ----- _ D t)l ; ). I (we) --------"-e�----'�--""-1----- - - - of / - ll-,�,:({1//(3t:·< ejy_ 1 L;(JJ1vl/!f2Z<-f � - - ----------- - - -, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FRO� THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: _ _ _______________________ ___ □ A PERMIT FOR USE □ A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE □ A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY □ A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE □ A TEMPORARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF � AREA PERMIT 1. Applicant is the � PROPERTY OWNER □ CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN □ PROSPECTIVE TENANT □ OTHER (Describe) -,-----,.,,----------------------- --- �s��- �� 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY-�I Y��s�·v_tJ_ T"""'- - ��-1____________ 3. State in gene ·al the exact nature of the permission required, - �-?�, - N_(M,����---0-� --�� �-- 9_- _O_(i. f: _,.---- __ cs \) L 4. PREV IOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect � to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No. , dated ________________ , 2Q ___ _ 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared byall properties alike in the immediate vicinityof this propertyand in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not change the character of the district because: ____ _ _ _ B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:---�--- - ------------ - C. A Special or TemporaryPermit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article____ Section---, Subsection---, Paragraph_ _ of the Zon;ng Mnanee, bee _ � d_ �/ .. rpplicant's Stlwiure TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 2. Zoning Classification of the propertyconcerned in this appeal--... � - ...-�::1 t) --+..., ·-.- ,_________________ ,..,, 3. Ty e of Appeal: [ Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or TemporaryPermit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of anyother facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. - - - - - --------- Bu;/d;,,g ls,ww 2r---- Page 51 of 68

Page 52 of 68

Page 53 of 68

Page 54 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS Tel. N� Appeal No. 2D2lo 0 l \ - </�o /.7 Date______ __. � -____ _ TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: 1 (w� s�"'? k vi�-., i--i Cl f1._ off s-C,tt1 Se-nee� 5+-v--e-e+ _W __� _s_, _l-+v ·7_l__y 2_l_l,�'-------, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: _____________________ _ _ _ ____ □ A PERMIT FOR USE □ A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE □ A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY □ A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE □ A TEMPORARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF !ti([ AREA PERMIT I. Applicant is the JZ] PROPERTY OWNER � CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN 0 PROSPECTIVE TENANT � w □ OTHER (Descr�e) • " 'L V \ � "· � 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY � · SQ,,N(i(}s-- 3. State in general the exact nature of t�ermission required, gU-q- ee{)--4t� Ci,t::&G.{l o�\...... 4. PR V IOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has b_�eR made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No. f\� , dated • , 2Q___ _ 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not change the character of the dist1ict because:------- B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:- -�------------ - ---- C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article___ _ Section- - -, Subsection- - -, Paragraph_ __of the Zoning Ordinance, because:---�------ ----- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 2. Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appeal __________ _ ______________ 3. Tyi;,epf Appeal: � Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. D Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. - -------------- Building /nsq_•*---,,.-+-- --- � - ---- ----- Page 55 of 68

Page 56 of 68

Page 57 of 68

Page 58 of 68

Page 59 of 68

Page 60 of 68

Page 61 of 68

APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. J_o;)," -()()_ Date .t/ /-z I 'Z, �2 TO THE �ING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: ;x I (we) �AA/Z>(__-;:ri5:4clv-,1,4 ✓ of ?£Sv.47,v.::'.,1f':.:(e_J}/ v ��· .L.<1, ::.:::<· L.:c::J·:.!:.!�c.e::-"t...:vJ· -==6:::...,,,_· =-- ',);::; -.!..L..,;t:....------- -, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZON'G BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUIL G INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: ____________________________ 0 A PERMIT FOR USE 0 A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE 0 A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 0 A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE 0 A TEMPORARY ,PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF _.t:g· AREA PERMIT l. Applicant is the .u(PROPERTY OWNER 0 CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN 0 PROSPECTIVE TENANT 0 OTHER (Describe)---------------------------- 2. "--·C·__,S,..-"-'· .cao.::i:"'l LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY--�---L-. !,il =�---------------- 1 -"'11'-S:�:·,.,_,/-4, 3. State in general the exact nature of the permission required,---------------------- 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No.--- , dated ----------------, 20-- - 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A. A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance and would not change the character of the district because:------- 7). ,.,, ,:: : fr., ,"l"\ ,,_,_ t �·"'"' ,.1.-r,. d 1 l"p ·� B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: ______________________ C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article ____ Section ___ , Subsection ___ , Paragraph---Of the Zoning Ordinance, because;.______________ ,,,.-� Applicant's Signature TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR 1. Provision(s) of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance ,z,:; .. ?,{) rr,;,,.,;,,._,,.,..,,_ {;-,,.,,../- 'J/h/d s:ald..,.I< 'So ( :· ep,-..,,,·h<A-f l/!? .. s.' I 2.Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appeal�C2--·-=-!_,__,S-'------------------- 3.Type of Appeal: M Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. D Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. C,aa,.-..r ' lo/,, l '5-eA, ., e til.:t:i ,.J ,OOu,,1�./ l"'n-t s of.i J�r,vv>-,'fl-•I f ,.Jt�i:.,,,-,._ \, Building lnspe!tor_Q,.__--=r-=1-.·CS--:1-,c; .....-------------- Page 62 of 68

Page 63 of 68

Page 64 of 68

Page 65 of 68

') APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS Tel. No Appeal No.202(_o"�()f � Date i.// G / 2 ct- TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, WEST SENECA, NEW YORK: J (we) JL c l. ,..,, L· ;, h �-tn z __ of--�,.,__ _ C h_J_r__,,7;-,f,----"c,---"'tl =-..c.. t------- "- - ---------------, HEREBY APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AN APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DID DENY PERMIT TO: ________ _ ___________________ □ A PERMIT FOR USE 0 A CERTIFICATE OF EXISTING USE □ A PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 0 A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE □ A TEMPORARY PERMIT OR EXTENSION THEREOF AREA PERMIT I. Applicant is the � PROPERTY OWNER □ CONTRACTOR FOR THE WORK CONCERNED HEREIN 0 PROSPECTIV E TENANT □ OTHER (Describe)------------------- --------- 2. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY _ _ _ '7�--'-�'"'-"�r--+--t�f�(2_1_. .._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ ___ 3. State in general the exact nature of the permission required,---------------------- - 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL. No previous appeal has been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect , dated-- - ----- - ------, 2Q _ to this property, except the appeal made in Appeal No.- - - _ _ 5. REASON FOR APPEAL. A. A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship, or the hardship created is unique and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district, or the variance would observe the spirit of the ordinance• and would not change the character of the district because:---- -- - • {,_, ., 1-...u.1' ,, \ ) B. Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:---�---- -------------- C. A Special or Temporary Permit or an Extension thereof Under the Zoning Ordinance is requested pursuant to Article ____ Section---, Subsection ___ , Paragraph ___ of the Zoning Ordinan·ce, because: _______________ ---1.pplicant's Signati1.re ' TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR l. Provision(s) of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, including article, section, subsection or paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance '? n . /R\ /--c"1U\ 'C'- ti �) ,/�(-u I L/ I I..-. h • 1- J/ I 2. Zoning Classification of the property concerned in this appeal __,rZ..:___'=1---'-S:=-------------------- 3. Type of Appeal: � Variance to the Zoning Ordinance. tJInterpretation of the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map. D Special or Temporary Permit or an xtension thereof under the Zoning Ordinance. 4. A statement of any other facts or data which should be considered in this appeal. __C_=fl �r �,.,.����/�o_,l,� ------- - =--� - �- I;;> Building lnspector�r-:>.,..,,...,,==�...,, --�- ) - - ----------- . of 68 • ' 66 Page

Page 67 of 68

Page 68 of 68