Text · page 5 of 14
Town of Hamburg Planning Board Minutes August 5, 2026 Member Quandt stated he would like to see a condition that states that no outdoor seating maybe provided on the concrete patio to prevent any congregation or potential outdoor consumption. All board members were in agreement. Chair Gronachan summarized the following: • Since the first rule is that the building has to be completely enclosed, they will be putting that as a condition. • The Applicant is to change the garage door and patio so that there is no false invitation. • The garage door is not going to be installed, and it is going to be glass. o The Planning Board is not opposed to frosted or tinted glass. • There will be notification outside that there is no use or outdoor consumption. • The Planning Board will need the detailed security narrative with a breakdown of all cameras and security measures. The project was then tabled to the August 19, 2026 Planning Board meeting. Hamburg II East ESS, LLC and Hamburg II West ESS, LLC- Requesting Zoning Board Approval of a Use Variance and Planning Board Approval for a Change of Use and Site Plan Approval for a Tier 3 battery energy storage system (BESS) to be located on a 2.7-acre site at 6433 Railroad Avenue Attorney Sean Hopkins appeared on behalf of the project along with Jeremy Kauffman the Project Manager at RIC Energy, Paul Rogers from Emergency Safety Response Group (ESRG), Samantha Parker-Fann the Environmental Project Manager, and Andrew Welch, Director of Development at RIC Energy. Mr. Kauffman stated as requested, they have submitted the noise study, emergency response plan, and hazard mitigation analysis for Planning Board review. Mr. Hopkins explained that this project is simultaneously in front of the Zoning Board of Appeals because this project does require a use variance. Prior to the Zoning Board of Appeals being in a position to issue a decision on a use variance, they require a SEQRA determination from this board. At this time, the Applicant is asking the Planning Board to issue a Negative Declaration so that they may go to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The reason for tonight’s meeting was to have the subject matter experts present to answer some of the technical questions that had previously been asked. This project was sent out to other agencies for comments and the only two (2) comments that were received were from the New York State Department of Environmental 5