Southtowns Record

TBM04.27.2026

Government
Town of West Seneca
Board
Town Board
Meeting
Apr 27, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
Posted by publisher
May 18, 2026
Kind
Minutes
Topics
Zoning and land use, Parks and recreation, Public safety, Budget and taxes, Water, sewer and drainage, Short-term rentals, Housing, Audits and oversight

Original document

Same meeting

Text · page 7 of 19

WEST SENECA COURT ROOM  TOWN BOARD PROCEEDINGS
1250 Union Road  Minutes - Meeting # 2026-08
West Seneca, NY 14224  April 27, 2026

and that the project does not align with the existing neighborhood, in his opinion. Furthermore, in his
opinion, the request for rezoning should have been a condition when the applicant was buying the
property and believes the proposed project was planned at that time. Councilmember Robertson
stated the initial communication with the community was lacking, and the process could have been
more transparent with better community outreach to the surrounding residents. Councilmember
Robertson stated that he is not a fan of What If security and, in his opinion, an operation that is open
24/7 should have onsite administration. In addition to security concerns, there is uncertainty whether
this would be spot zoning. Councilmember Robertson then read the spot zoning clause and feels
there are variables that make it unclear. Councilmember Robertson asked Mr. Hopkins if or was
eliminating Phase 2 is a consideration. Mr. Hopkins stated eliminating Phase 2 has not been
considered, but the applicant is amenable to the condition that they return for approval of Phase 2.
Also acceptable would be Town Board review and approval of the security plan.

Councilmember Robertson stated the area is largely residential and the current business exists
because it is a preexisting, nonconforming use. The proposed project would change the footprint and
the nature of the business. The project would alter the landscape.

Supervisor Dickson stated that he listens to the residents and, in his opinion, the hotel
accommodation would provide some sales and property tax benefit, noting the only dramatic benefit
the town will see is the development of the Old Seneca Mall site, but every bit helps. Further, the
property is already used for commercial purposes and disagrees about what intoxicated people
would do, and commented that they would go back to their rooms. The proposed project would help a
local business that has been there for decades. The expansion is limited in scope and can be
considered an extension of its current business. The expansion would provide a few jobs. The
expanded parking lot will help. There will not be a restaurant or bar. The single story style was
requested. The wetlands are not affected, and the proposed plan increases the natural barriers. The
Comprehensive Plan labels this parcel as recreation and entertainment, and the proposed project fits
the economic plan for tourism. Infrastructure issues will be addressed by each particular agency:
sewer, water, and electricity. Supervisor Dickson stated he is struggling with people not attending
events using the rooms. If there was nothing on the property, zoning would never allow a hotel; but
he could support adding rooms being used for people at a wedding. The neighbors share the concern
over the rooms being available to anyone. The applicant has indicated that the project is not viable if
they do not allow the rooms to be available to those not associated with an event. Supervisor
Dickson repeated the statement that if nothing was currently there, a hotel would never be allowed.
Again, if the project was intended to be an extension of the business at Kloc's would be fine. The
Planning Board also discussed this.

Councilmember Robertson asked what Check-In would look like, for example, similar to an Airbnb.
Mr. Hopkins stated he anticipates the check-in process would be virtual, noting the family owns the
facility and would be onsite. Councilmember Robertson stated while he appreciates Mr. Hopkins'
information, he feels the onsite presence would be limited and sporadic, and anticipates the rooms
would be utilized more frequently than just the venue itself.

Councilmember Sherman stated that when she heard of the proposal, it was to have space available
for overnight for the guests of the facility, and it seemed like 24 rooms would be adequate. To then
need Phase 2, which would be many rooms for a wedding venue. Councilmember Sheman asked
how the rooms would be managed for guests of the facility. Mr. Hopkins stated the applicant could

  7