Text · page 10 of 33
Read the whole document on one page (all 33 pages, each with its own heading)
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
character of the area. She and her family are opposed to the application and asked the board to look at the long- term effects of this application. Rod Simeon of 85 Byeberry Court raised concerns regarding the zoning of the lot and the districts of RR and Ag, as it pertains to the definition of a campground. He asked whether campground and camp are one of the same. Chairman Doug Crow replied that the board’s understanding is that ia a campground is based on the agriculture zoning district on the lot and the wellness site is apart | Mocessory- -use of the camp/campground, and that camp/eampground ini the agriculture zoning district ‘é i ou i Asst. CEO Richard Miga interjected in agreement with a A st H iy ‘ Uh Rod Simeon states that under Rural Residential sf i'6-8.4A(6), the well ih enter is not permitted use Mg based on the application exceeding the allowable limit tgs i 4 Chairman Doug Crow replied that the boarg 3 derstandin, application is cero’ under the agriculture (116-8.5) for the proposed applie ih .. nd "os include # 1 in building where the building is in both the RR and Ag districts. Peter i Sorgi responded : that ‘ theiaN mor tion: is iy poln: is solely in the As district and aee e aspects of permitte “i ~~ e€ q Rod Simeon then suasione he ‘ ied, if it is not seasonal and exceeding the pare) Q =! oO Q permitted allotment of employee uy iy Peter Sorgi reap 6 iGi Page yVtompliane with the code because the application is presented. au iC ‘boatd for re | is considered in the Ag district and customary incidental not. ‘e Rod Simeon then say t the board Wiking theif deliberation that they should seek Town’s council before voting. % ] Courtney, of 1289 Main af baud ‘Road) stated that she seconds the points that were made in the public comments and is concerned that te I tivation isi a play on words, and that a year-round camping facility that is within a house is not considered atel Dan Quinn of 1224 Big Tree Road stated concems of the intent of this large financial investment being achievable as a campground if other things not clearly defined in the application are sought to get a return on the investment. He then stated an example of the closest campground, Three-Valley Campground iin Holland, that is 460 acres as a comparison. Chairman Doug Crow asks in closing the public comment asked if Peter Sorgi has any closing comments.