Text · page 3 of 4
CEO Cassidy Correct Burkhardt Just to clarify for myself and the record only the goat and goat enclosure will move to the Agriculture district. And then the plan is to continue with 6 chickens and not proceed with getting the additional chickens. Ernst No, he will be moving the additional chickens back too. Kotarski And the rooster moves too. Carl You will continue to house 6 hens in the smaller structure and put the rooster and remaining chickens into the Agricultural district. Kotarski I will. Ernst If we table it, we request you come back next month with a sketch showing the new location and if we approve it then we could put a timeline on when to move it. Kotarski Agreed. Simeone The structure on the left, as you face your house, we’ll call it the chicken coop. You will retain 6 hens in that building/coop and not move it? Kotarski Correct. Simeone Ok. The other one, we’ll call it the goat house, will be 300+’ back and you’ll have the goats and remaining chickens and the rooster. Kotarski Correct Simeone If he does that then the request for a variance goes away, is that correct? CEO Cassidy Correct. Simeone That sounds reasonable. If you come back with a drawing next month, we can set a timeline and if it’s carried out then there will be no decision needed from this board. Ernst Just to be clear, you have a 33’ right-of-way from the centerline of the road to your property line and the 300’ is beyond that point. In case you’re trying to pace that off. Kotarski Right. That’s why if I go back 345’ then that should be a safe distance. Ernst Opened the hearing to public, if anyone would like to speak on this Case. Hearing no one, Chair Ernst closed the public hearing. Page 3 of 4