Southtowns Record

ZBA Agenda Packet 1.28.26

Government
Town of West Seneca
Board
Zoning Board of Appeals
Meeting
Jan 28, 2026, 6:00 p.m.
Posted by publisher
Apr 15, 2026
Kind
Agenda packet
Topics
Zoning and land use, Public safety, Housing, Parks and recreation, Roads and traffic

Original document

Same meeting

Text · page 11 of 40

Read the whole document on one page (all 40 pages, each with its own heading)

WEST SENECA COMMUNITY CENTER  Zoning Board of Appeals
1300 Union Road  Minutes #2025-11
West Seneca, NY 14224  December 3, 2025

 - Any proposed sign shall be installed on private property outside of NYSDOT's Right-of Way

 Mr. Johnson referred to the layout and stated the pole would be located closer to the existing fence,
 not the road. Chairperson Hicks confirmed that the sign would not be in the right-of-way. Mr. Johnson
 stated it would not. Mr. Bedient referred to the picture he received and asked if the picture did not
 accurately depict the location. Mr. Busse confirmed the post would actually be located next to the
 fence and he would assist Mr. Johnson with the NYSDOT work permit application. Mr. Bedient asked
 if the sign would be clear of the power lines. Mr. Johnson confirmed the sign would not hit the power
 lines.

 Chairperson Hicks stated Erie County Department of Environment and Planning responded to the
 ZR-1 notification, has no recommendation, and determined the request is a local concern.

 Mr. Johnson asked if he would need to return to the Zoning Board after receiving a work permit from
 NYSDOT. Mr.Trapp stated if the Zoning Board approves the variance, it would be contingent upon
 meeting NYSDOT's requirements.

 Chairperson Hicks commented that the adjacent neighbors did not have any objections to the
 proposed sign.

 Ms. Greenan referred to the area variance balancing test: 1) Is there an undesirable change to the
 neighborhood - no, there are neighbor letters in support; 2) Is there an alternative – Ms. Greenan
 asked Mr. Johnson if there are any alternatives to the LED sign. Mr. Johnson stated that in his
 opinion, there is not an alternative means to achieve the impact on passing motorists. Mr. Busse
 added that the LED would provide additional advertising opportunities. 3) Is the request substantial –
 Chairperson Hicks stated the sign is otherwise compliant with the town code. Mr. Busse confirmed
 this is correct. Chairperson Hicks concluded the request is not substantial. 4) Does the variance have
 an impact on the environment – Mr. Johnson stated the hours of operation are daily between the
 hours of 10 A.M. - 11 P.M. Mr. Busse stated he would review the LED sign requirements with the
 applicant when the permit is issued. 5) Is this a self-created difficulty – Chairperson Hicks stated the
 business is located in a mixed use area and there is limited space for the sign to be located and
 concluded this is not a self-created difficulty. Mr. Bedient referred to item no. 3 and stated that, in his
 opinion, the request is not substantial and the sign appears to be at least 500' from either adjacent
 residence. Further, the proposed sign would be an improvement to the area.

 Motion by Bedient, seconded by Greenan, to close the public hearing and grant a variance for
 property located at 3815 Clinton Street to allow a LED Messaging sign within 500' of residential
 zoning pursuant to compliance with NYSDOT requirements.

 Ayes: 4  Noes: 0  Abstain: 0  Motion Carried

 2025-044
 Request of Mike Betti for property located at 11 Greenspring Court to allow construction of a fence 6’
 feet height in the front/side yard (maximum height of 4’ allowed in front/side yard).

 Mike Betti stated he is requesting to extend a 6' fence along the side of his property to provide safety

  9
  Page 11 of 40