Text · page 10 of 18
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
PAGE 2 OF 4: 3. The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.: Yes X No__ ILLUSTRATIVE Proof: AREA WAS MULTIPLE RECREATIONAL TYPE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER FACTORS RESIDENTS (VEgmMany ILE cee) ALSs HAS ExXtsrine * Board members’ observations of BulegweS neighborhood. * Expected effect of proposal on neighborhood, for example, change in parking patterns, noise levels, lighting, traffic. 4. The alleged hardship has been self-created. : YesX No __ Proof: ALL VARIANCES ARE SELF CREATES, SELF-CREATED * What were the permitted uses at the time the property was purchased by the applicant? ¢ Were substantial sums spent on remodeling for a use not permitted by zoning? * Was the property received through inheritance, court order, divorce? DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after reviewing the above four proofs, finds: ] That the applicant has failed to prove unnecessary hardship through the application of the four tests required by the state statutes. [] That the applicant has proven unnecessary hardship through the application of the four tests required by the state statutes. In finding such hardship, the ZBA shall grants a variance to allow use of the property in the manner detailed below, which is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community: (USE)