Text · page 9 of 18
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
USE VARIANCE FINDINGS OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. UV- | ~AO. & DECISION Date of Application: (Postmarked or Hand Delivéred) Date of Public Hearing: “3 | Date Notice Published: 3/3/; Applicant: S GV id Sthauh~ [win wood Fo rest, Date of County Referral: ; ALC Date of Final Action: = Appeal Concerns pen at the following address: Date of Filing of Decision with the Cacpentec Koa Municipal Clerk: 3 IVA County Tax Map Section: Block Lot Zoning District Classification:. Use for which Variance is Requested: Applicable Section of Zoning Code: Permitted Uses of Property: TEST: No use variance will be granted without a showing by the applicant that applicable zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. The following tests must be met for each and every use allowed by zoning on the property, including uses allowed by special use permit. ILLUSTRATIONS OF 1.The Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, as shown by FINANCIAL EVIDENCE competent financial evidence. The lack of return must be * Bill of sale for the substantial. Yes___No X_ property, present value of property, expenses for Proof, THE PRoPEeTy COM BE USED KEAN AR maintenance ° Leases, rental agreements AS-1$. SY FINaMowe sues ACE SELE * Tax bills * Conversion costs (for a MA0E permitted use) * Realtor’s statement of inability to rent/sell 2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique. (The ILLUSTRATIONS OF hardship may not apply to a substantial portion of the zoning district UNIQUENESS * Topographic or physical or neighborhood.): Yes3 No features preventing BEWG6 YSeo AS LiviING development for a Proofs) No® Main BulLoiwG, permitted use ¢ Why would it be possible Qu ARTES to construct the applicant's proposal and not any of the permitted uses? ¢ Board member observations of the - property and surrounding area.