Southtowns Record

Case#1 - Finding and Decision

Government
Town of Wales
Kind
Other
Topics
Zoning and land use

Original document

Text · page 5 of 18

This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.

USE VARIANCE  FINDINGS  OFFICE  USE  ONLY

  a
  Application No. UV- _j - 20]
  & DECISION  Date of Application: }A]/G/ Ae
  (Postmarked or Hand Deli rg d)
  Date of Public Hearing
 Applicant:  aS  ; rest,
  4
  Date Notice Published:
  Date of County Referral:  —

  ‘  LLC  Date of Final Action:
 Appeal Concerns Rood  at the following address:  Date of Filing of Decisionwith the
 facpentec  Koa  Municipal Clerk: eNILIETD
 County Tax Map Section:  Block  Lot
 Zoning District Classification:

 Use for which Variance is Requested: Ise  YNVY  No  acceseny  Reus ld nc  Sheu lg
be  OS  nN  Dewy  Las,  2  (Vo?  C.€C.S¢-,  5  Reur  re  wi  4Loiw  Ih  “he.  (ney oft
  Analn  Cxi, FUAWSFO  ¥  a  3
 \o cole  PAS

 Applicable Section of Zoning Code: Loe .£) | Y  Wao  - 2X
 Permitted Uses of Property:

TEST: No use variance will be granted without a showing by the applicant that applicable
zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. The following tests
must be met for each and every use allowed by zoning on the property, including uses allowed
by special use permit.
  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
1.The Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, as shown by  FINANCIAL EVIDENCE
competent financial evidence.  The lack of return must be  * Bill of sale for the
substantial.: Yes  No X_  property, present value of
  property, expenses for
Proof:  his  Brueeny]  Gel  hos  Va dye  maintenance
  * Leases, rental
 hes  ain un  es PRC  ud  (n Sv S  Gn  d  Caw) a  b tL  agreements
  ° Tax bills
  * Conversion costs (for a
 Lien  A
  permitted use)
  * Realtor’s statement of
  inability to rent/sell

2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique. (The  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
hardship may not apply to a ae  portion of the zoning district  UNIQUENESS
or neighborhood.): Yes___ No  * Topographic or physical
  features preventing
  development for a
Proofs:_| 1:5  frcoPec sy  Sweden  Fhe  permitted use
  ¢ Why would it be possible
Sine  Hepwe  \ ahr  §  QS  th  e  Gin
  to construct the applicant's
  proposal and not any of the
Erwec-Mi  4  PA  Fe  Sonne  Reore.  permitted uses?
  ¢ Board member
  observations of the -
  property and surrounding
  area.