Text · page 6 of 18
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
PAGE 2 OF 4: 3. The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.: Yes__ No =X ILLUSTRATIVE Proof: yuis Vac anty Wow \d aWow/ 4or- NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER FACTORS Val? Sa\ rons +0. & 44 F MN en * Board members’ observations of @BNAG AAArnor Noy eye Are Et44 oF neighborhood. ¢ Expected effect of yn, ca Ne? bee Lvl proposal on neighborhood, for example, change in parking patterns, noise levels, lighting, traffic. 4. The alleged hardship has been self-created. : YesX No __ Proof Th.S \and 1% Aor GAT FOR SELF-CREATED * What were the permitted uses at the AR We HS Byaxed tnx Rt Code time the property was purchased by the applicant? ¢ Were substantial sums spent on remodeling for a use not permitted by zoning? * Was the property received through inheritance, court order, divorce? DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after reviewing the above four proofs, finds: That the applicant has failed to prove unnecessary hardship through the application of the four tests required by the state statutes. L] That the applicant has proven unnecessary hardship through the application of the four tests required by the state statutes. In finding such hardship, the ZBA shall grants a variance to allow use of the property in the manner detailed below, which is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community: (USE)