Southtowns Record

Case#2 - Finding and Decision

Government
Town of Wales
Kind
Other
Topics
Zoning and land use

Original document

Text · page 1 of 17

This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.

Case 2.
  USE VARIANCE FINDINGS  OFFICE  USE ONLY
  Application No. UV-A-2OD/
  & DECISION  Date of Application:
  (Postmarked or Hand Deliveréd)
  Date of Public Hearing: S/IZIAL,
  Applicant: b avid  Sahauh  = Twin wood Forest  Date Notice Published: :
  Date of County Referral:
  ;  LAG  Date of Final Action:  iv
  Appeal Concerns ippery at the following address:  Date of Filing of Decisio
  with nthe
  La cpente  a  Koa  Municipal Clerk:  3  {19 1Q/,
  County Tax Map Section: ___  Block  Lot  t
  Zoning District Classification:  \

  Use for which Variance is Requested:  ZOO,  2S  &  2s  Ay

  \
  Applicable Section of Zoning Code:_“C-CO»L@* =  266,441
  Permitted Uses of Property:

  TEST: No use variance will be granted without a showing by the applicant that applicable
  zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. The following tests
  must be met for each and every use allowed by zoning on the property, including uses allowed
  by special use permit.
  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
  1.The Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, as shown by  FINANCIAL EVIDENCE
  competent financial evidence. The lack of return must be  * Bill of sale for the
« SR? substantial: Yes___No>*”  property, present value of
  property, expenses for
  Hit, roof:  A he  ope  co) LAN  Sutloly  mo!  maintenance
  ° Leases, rental
  “  abo  Ne  anw  Wew3 | Supepyntt  agreements
  * Tax bills
  ands,  Modthrccdion  s Ai  oashivs,  shod  * Conversion costs (for a
  permitted use)
  ¢ Realtor's statement of
  co  OND  a  ond  ephow.  inability to rent/sell

  2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique.  (The  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
Dh  UNIQUENESS
I
  hardshipi may not apply to a substantialial p portion of the @ zoning
  zoning district
  aisine"  Topographic or physical
Wi  or neighborhood.): Yes___No_==
  features preventing
  development for a
  Proofs:_T he  aop\lccat  Leo$  Boe  Ops vros  permitted use
  * Why would it be possible
  acKwo  las  Mant  Meck  ot ean  WIS
  to construct the applicant's
  proposal and not any of the
  B=  a)  dea  lowsloues  anprotrtly,  permitted uses?
  ¢ Board member
  observations of the -
  property and surrounding
  area.