Southtowns Record

Case#2 - Finding and Decision

Government
Town of Wales
Kind
Other
Topics
Zoning and land use

Original document

Text · page 4 of 17

This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.

USE VARIANCE FINDINGS  SeFOE USE ONL
  & DECISION  Sue ot Aptetontle ab
  (Postmarked or Hand Deli  fe)d)
  Date of Public Hearing: ;
  i  -  :  j.  | Date Notice Published:  3/Af
  Applicant:  b Ovi d  D4  hauh  Iw: n wood Forest  Date of County Referral:  _—
  LLC  |  Date of Final Action:  _—
 Appeal Concerns ie  at the following address:  Date of Filing of Declsion,with the
 La rpentec  Koa  Municipal Clerk:  DNAAlo
 County Tax Map Section:  Block  Lot  .
 Zoning District Classification:

 Use for which Variance is Requested: Ween  “iy  No  ACCeseny  Rus llrc  Sherw Id
 oe  OS  ow  Dewak k Ss  a  KVC2  C. CC.  Sig  By ws  1d  a6  Sew  Ie  “be.  Gs  ot
 \yc  Ecce  he  Dnata  Cx  fed  WEG

 Applicable Section of Zoning Code: >~-0@ .£) | 4  Wag  — 2X
 Permitted Uses of Property:

 TEST: No use variance will be granted without a showing by the applicant that applicable
 zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. The following tests
 must be met for each and every use allowed by zoning on the property, including uses allowed
 by special use permit.
  ;  ;  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
1.The Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, as shown by  FINANCIAL EVIDENCE
competentfinancial evidence. The lack of return must be  * Bill of sale for the
substantial.: Yes___No_ X_  property, present value of
  property, expenses for
Proof:  J  kis  prepcay  Stel  heS  ade  ._ | maintenance
  .  ;  -  * Leases, rental
 fon  otru  _appcsved  WSS  Gand  uid  be  _|]agreements
  -  ° Tax bills
  * Conversion costs (for a
 Lo\  A  permitted use)
  ¢ Realtor’s statement of
  inability to rent/sell

2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique. (The  ILLUSTRATIONS OF
  UNIQUENESS;  ;
hardship may not apply to a substantial portion of the zoning district
or neighborhood.): Yes  Nook  * Topographic or physical
  OO  features preventing
  FL~  development for a
Proofs: | his  frcopPec sy  _  Yn, he  permitted use
  * Why would it be possible
Ste  Pefwre  aban $  QS  The  Other  to construct the applicant's
  ~  .  proposal and not any of the
ereecHt 5  MA  he  Garne  Dore,  permitted uses?
  * Board member
  observations of the -
  property and surrounding
  area.