Text · page 5 of 17
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
PAGE 2 OF 4: 3. The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.: Yes___No X ILLUSTRATIVE Proofs Vis \earancy World atte for NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER FACTORS \ya\y? So\ Lronducsé +0 Ox S9 WN en * Board members’ observations of OSNeAg ASANaa-6 No Vivee Pre E44 of neighborhood. * Expected effect of dave Ned bee Legal proposal on neighborhood, for example, change in parking patterns, noise levels, lighting, traffic. 4. The alleged hardship has been self-created. : Yes% _ No Proof: Ths Laad 1S not Sort bv Fon SELF-CREATED ¢ What were the Aye We WS SD DA Rt Code permitted uses at the time the property was purchased by the applicant? ¢ Were substantial sums spent on remodeling for a use not permitted by zoning? * Was the property received through inheritance, court order, divorce? DETERMINATION OF ZBA BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS: The ZBA, after reviewing the above four proofs, finds: That the applicant has failed to prove unnecessary hardship through the application of the four tests required by the state statutes. [] That the applicant has proven unnecessary hardship through the application of the four tests required by the state statutes. In finding such hardship, the ZBA shall grants a variance to allow use of the property in the manner detailed below, which is the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community: (USE)