Southtowns Record

Village Board agenda — October 5, 2026

Government
Village of East Aurora
Board
Village Board
Meeting
Oct 5, 2026
Kind
Agenda
Topics
Zoning and land use, Public safety, Audits and oversight, Roads and traffic, Budget and taxes, Parks and recreation, Water, sewer and drainage

Original document

Same meeting

Text · page 6 of 117

WHEREAS, the Village Board referred the site plan to the Planning Commission for review,
  comment, and recommendation, and the Planning Commission resolution recommending site
  plan approval, with findings; and
  WHEREAS, the Village’s SEQRA Intake Committee considered the application and reviewed
  Part 1 of the Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by the applicant and completed
  Part 2 and Part 3 thereof on behalf of the Village, and it was the recommendation of the SEQRA
  Committee and approved by the Village Board as a Negative Declaration, including that the
  proposed development plan is an Unlisted Action and would have no significant environmental
  impact; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board at a public meeting reviewed and considered further the
  comments and all written materials submitted by the applicant and all other information and
  recommendations before the Board, including minutes of prior Village Board meetings and the
  recommendations from the SEQRA Intake Committee and Planning Commission, and the
  referral and response from the; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board received and considered the Site Plan, the above referenced
  upgrades, and any and all amendments thereof; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Board has separately considered the environmental impacts of the
  project, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration of environmental
  significance, with the proposal classified as an Unlisted Action.
  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Village Board as follows:
  1. The Findings of Fact of the SEQRA Intake Committee, the resolution with findings of the
  Planning Commission, and the site plan application, all information included in the minutes
  taken in relation to the abovementioned Village Board and Planning Commission meetings are
  herein incorporated by reference, including the following findings of the Planning Commission:
  The application is for a minor modification to the structure, code-compliant, and not visible from
  the street.
  2. The Resolution of the Village Board considering the environmental impacts of the project and
  the issuance of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance is incorporated herein by
  reference.
  3. The Site Plan relating to the proposed project at 63 South Grove Street, East Aurora, New
  York, wherein the applicant proposes to remove and reconstruct a rear deck that is required to be
  moved so a rear addition can be constructed as detailed on documents submitted with the
  application, is hereby approved and is subject to the following additional conditions:
  a.
  ______________________________________________________________
  ______________________________________________________________
  ______________________________________________________________
  4. The resolution is effective immediately, approving the issuance of a development and
  construction permit as hereinbefore set forth, subject to compliance with all applicable federal,
  state, and local laws and codes.
o Resolution of the Village of East Aurora of a Determination of Non-Significance pursuant to the
  State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) in the matter of the Site Plan Application for
  30 Buffalo Road, for a micro cell wireless telecommunication antenna and associated equipment
  on an existing 43’ high NYSEG-owned utility pole.
  WHEREAS, the applicant has filed Part 1 of the Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF)
  with this Board, a copy of which is included by reference and made a part hereof, relating to the
  proposed project at 30 Buffalo Road, East Aurora, New York, wherein the applicant Jared C.
  Lusk, Esq; and
  WHEREAS, the Village Planning Commission, after carefully and fully reviewing the
  application, including the Site Plan attached thereto, with any and all amendments and
  modifications, and considering comments and documentation presented for and against the
  project, voted in the majority recommending approval, with findings; and