Text · page 8 of 117
taken in relation to the abovementioned Village Board and Planning Commission meetings, are herein incorporated by reference, including the following findings of the Planning Commission: a. The project promises to provide an enhanced service to the people in certain underserved areas of the Village. b. It will have minimal visual and auditory impact. c. There will be no tree trimming. d. The selection of the location is a result of careful evaluation of several alternatives in each of the areas. e. No operational lights associated with the micro cell. f. No ability to alter the position or color of the micro cell box on the pole. 2. The Resolution of the Village Board considering the environmental impacts of the project and the issuance of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance is incorporated herein by reference. 3. The Site Plan relating to the proposed project at 30 Buffalo Road, East Aurora, New York, wherein the applicant proposes a micro cell wireless telecommunication antenna and associated equipment on an existing 43’ high NYSEG-owned utility pole, as detailed on documents submitted with the application, is hereby approved and is subject to the following additional conditions: a. ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ 4. The resolution is effective immediately, approving the issuance of a development and construction permit as hereinbefore set forth, subject to compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and codes. o Resolution of the Village of East Aurora of a Determination of Non-Significance pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) in the matter of the Site Plan Application for 340 Prospect Ave, micro cell wireless telecommunication antenna and associated equipment on an existing 38.5’ high NYSEG-owned utility pole. WHEREAS, the applicant has filed Part 1 of the Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) with this Board, a copy of which is included by reference and made a part hereof, relating to the proposed project at 340 Prospect Avenue, East Aurora, New York, wherein the applicant, Jared C. Lusk, Esq., project attorney; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Commission, after carefully and fully reviewing the application, including the Site Plan attached thereto, with any and all amendments and modifications, and considering comments and documentation presented for and against the project, voted in the majority recommending approval, with findings; and WHEREAS, the Village SEQRA Intake Committee carefully and fully reviewed Part 1 of the SEAF submitted by applicants including the Site Plan attached thereto, and the above-referenced amendments and modifications; and WHEREAS, the Village SEQRA Intake Committee, after its review of the above, prepared Parts 2 and 3 of the SEAF with a recommendation of the issuance of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for submission to, and consideration by, the Village Board; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees, upon taking an independent hard look and reasoned evaluation of the above-referenced information, comments and written documentation, including, but not limited to, Part 1 of the SEAF; comments, recommendations, findings and conditions of the Planning Commission; the Site Plan; and the recommendation of the SEQRA Intake Committee and that Committee’s completed Parts 2 and 3 of the SEAF concerning the potential environmental impacts of the project; all of which are incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, the Village Board, upon carefully and fully reviewing all the information, comments, and written documentation in regard to the project, made a finding that there are no significant environmental impacts.