Text · page 19 of 48
Read the whole document on one page (all 48 pages, each with its own heading)
This document was a scan. Its text was produced by character recognition and may contain errors; check the original for exact wording.
Property Address 30 7 | Seul |, Lach Averut 1. What facts support that the applicant cannot realize a reasonable return ? The evnlicart wishee do adverlhise. broadadd to pg, Auid once. by USA 2. sian weitden thal 4 ba Arabic. thel Cuoredt allaweed toc , Si@naay Joes nok nrovlé a Gis enguad, Spack ta tnste il the dlfo-wmank oned Sigek 2. Why should the ZBA determine the alleged hards hip relatingto tha Property in question is unique, and does not apply to a substantial portion of the distri ct or nelghborhoad? The allege acdabin ta Gubsting LS Up ale, as tle Mronerty a olect.on ts cammcclol ! Buildioa iV a wrimerily tte Wigage- Area, Podential Custamecs tL make te taxi ihsben dole. to Cecaani22 rdy fe , Te bhs nese tron HE Mair. brti and, toMe [aF, y 3, Wilt the use variance, If granted, alter the essent ial character of the neighborho od ? Te the: Oa. Varian te granderl t bowitl nok ahem ble, 2 sxéntiel chara eer oof éle. Atle boohaed., 4. Will the proposed area variance have an adverse effect or Impact on the physical or environmental conditions In the nelghborhood or distri ct? The. ncoflosec) ate. Vermont ull nat have adved. Lé lect on He, ph Kt co | 2ov teen menks |an Condthons at tHe, otigh borhan a