Southtowns Record

Planning Board Regular Meeting, Feb 18, 2026 — Minutes

Government
Town of Hamburg
Board
Planning Board
Meeting
Feb 18, 2026
Kind
Minutes
Topics
Zoning and land use, Water, sewer and drainage, Roads and traffic, Public safety, Budget and taxes, Parks and recreation

Original document

Same meeting

Text · page 11 of 12

Read the whole document on one page (all 12 pages, each with its own heading)

Town of Hamburg Planning Board Minutes  February 18, 2026

  3. Lack of mitigation/suggestions from the CAB regarding protecting wetlands and
  Rush Creek. She requested that the CAB go back and complete the formal form
  that was presented to them in their February 2025 training and have it signed by
  all members.
  4. She believes that the applicant is failing to recognize that this project is too big
  for the property based on what the Planning Board is hearing. She had originally
  felt that building eight (8) should be shrunk but at this point she feels that some of
  the buildings should be removed all together due to the wetlands and Rush
  Creek. She is not in favor of any outdoor storage due to the creek and the
  potential for runoff. She would like to see the project smaller with increased
  landscaping.

Mr. Pandolfe addressed some of the concerns:
  1. When it comes to the outdoor storage and runoff into the creek, that would not
  happen as it would all be directed to the detention pond which will have
  stormwater treatment.
  2. They are conforming with the 100-foot buffer from Rush Creek that is in the code.
  3. Everything from the buildings to outdoor storage areas (which are allowed in the
  zoning) all will be going to the retention pond

Chair Gronachan asked what would happen if the creek were to flood.

Mr. Pandolfe explained that when the stormwater calculations are done, their runoff for
the proposed project has to be less than what comes from the site now. It has to meet
DEC requirements in that regard. If the creek were to flood, they have berms to protect
the outdoor storage.

Chair Gronachan stated that due to the fact that there is no guarantee that there could
not be flooding, which is why she feels there should not be any outdoor storage.

Mr. Pandolfe responded that it is not the Creek that is flooding, but the property is
flooded because of grading. He explained that the Applicant is proposing landscaping
along the north, not directly behind the buildings but on the strip of property that was
mentioned. It is not just the fence; it is the fence and landscaping.

Mr. Santa explained that Chair Gronachan mentioned that she wished the project was
smaller. He wanted to point out that the square footage did go down when they
separated the buildings. He also stated that he would be willing to put in more berms.

Member Ryan asked about landscaping by the fence, and where exactly is the
landscape going.

Mr. Santa stated that it will be the fence, landscaping, and then the project.

  11