Text · page 147 of 154
Read the whole document on one page (all 154 pages, each with its own heading)
What challenges does the Town face that may hinder progress? Fiscal challenges and fear of change were the most identified challenges that the Town may face. Others suggested lack of access to resources without a vehicle and lack of sewer and water access as other issues that may hold the Town back from its goals. Stakeholders stressed that the Town and Village must work together for progress and the Town should identify what progress means and move in that direction. Other challenges mentioned include lack of opportunities for kids in childcare, parking, traffic, deer overpopulation, development from Elma moving into the Town, and the need for updated zoning in conjunction with a comprehensive plan. If the Town had extra money in its budget, what would you define as the highest priority for spending? Stakeholders most frequently mentioned planting more trees and investing in existing parks as the highest priority for spending. Other responses include raises for Town employees, making high school and subdivisions more accessible to the village by adding sidewalks, maintaining infrastructure such as roads and sewers, adding new programs and services instead of embellishing existing ones, policing loud vehicles, tax reductions, and improving and preserving green space. What types of development would you like to see more of or less of in Aurora? Several stakeholders agreed that more residential development was needed and could be an asset if it was controlled. Some stakeholders wanted to see more reuse of existing historic structures such as barns that would keep the existing character but add needed small business or residential space. Other stakeholders had conflicting views saying that no new development was needed, and the Town should focus on ag development or conversely that the Town needed density and mixed-use style development and less agricultural or industrial development. What are the biggest transportation challenges you experience when traveling within Aurora, such as traffic congestion, road conditions, or lack of sidewalks? Stakeholders appeared to agree that roadways were well maintained but that there was minimal shoulder space for bicyclists to safely traverse the roads and dedicated bike lanes and facilities should be explored. Several stakeholders called for more sidewalks, crosswalks within and around the Village but agreed that throughout most of the Town, they were impractical. Another stakeholder pointed out that there were not many bus routes available and roadways and public parking lots in the Village were very congested on weekends. What types of recreational activities or facilities do you feel are missing or underrepresented in Aurora? Although the most popular answer among stakeholders was that there were no activities missing in Aurora, there were several others with suggestions, such as moving pickleball courts to South Street; additional bike paths in the southern part of town; splash pads in parks; a community pool; more athletic fields within the Hamlets; and additional places where nature hikes can occur. How would you envision a successful Aurora in the next 10-20 years, and what role do you think this comprehensive plan should play in achieving that vision? Although articulated in different ways, the most common theme among stakeholders was that they think the comprehensive plan should allow the Town to grow with minimal impact on the land and residents, and within public water and sewer areas. Many agreed that a Comprehensive Plan should go hand in hand with an updated zoning code to match the goals of the plan and that the plan should be reviewed every six months to make sure decisions are on track. 147